Awesome against black...really??? So you get a 1/1 for 2 CMC and if your opponent just happens to have a card with Pro Black you can sac this and take it away for a turn. Why don't you do something useful like use something blue, such as bounce, to deal with it since you obviously are playing blue. I am going to assume you were joking.
getz19
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
Wow. What a poor creature. He will sac himself so a White Knight can be killed by at least a 2/3 black creature. How heroic.
Definitely the funniest, if not the most worthless, card I've ever seen.
Snaxme
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(7 votes)
Naaaarrrrooooooooooow.
rufflmao
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0)(4 votes)
One of my friends gave me a load of old commons yestarday. I was scanning through them, and then read this card. I literally stared at it for minutes trying to understand why it is so awful.
One of the worst cards I've ever seen.
the list goes on, ravnica had some of the worst cards.
brunsbr103
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(3 votes)
nightcreep is actually pretty good. It can hose many a player's mana, not to mention the combo potential.
And I would say that there are many blocks far worse than Ravnica. Kamigawa, Homelands, Alara, the list goes on. Ravnica was cool, fair, and flavorfull. It was also home to fantastic cards, a masterpiece of a set.
Enchantment_Removal
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(4 votes)
WHY IS THIS RATED SO LOW???!?!?!!!?!111111
It is very playable- it only costs two mana. Since when are we expecting Blue creatures to roll up their sleeves and man-handle other creature. That Power/Toughness to Converted Mana Cost ratio stuff is not really for Blue (with a few exceptions). So for two mana you get a dude and a dude he is.
What better way to show you're a BAMF than to Terror someone's Akroma??
markarmor
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Considering there's fewer than 40 creatures that inherently have Pro-Black this is one of the worst creatures ever printed.
blindthrall
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(3 votes)
@kriissii: You obviously never heard of a set called Homelands. It had exactly one playable card- Sengir Autocrat. Just as a taste, check out this gem Aysen Highway.
Fanaticmogg
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Blue gets much better creatures than this... FOR ONE MANA. When a cheap blue creature is considered bad for its cost, you know you've got a bad card on your hands.
Scry_Kane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Sideboard only... and even then, it's a really bad choice. >_>
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is almost insultingly bad.
tHeMightyyAK123
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Bleh.
Earthdawn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Take THAT Akroma :)
Aquillion
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
If it had cost only , it would have been weak and very over-specific, but not terrible.
Comments (22)
Definitely the funniest, if not the most worthless, card I've ever seen.
One of the worst cards I've ever seen.
If you call the card this bad you haven't seen the worst yet.
Ever heard of cards like Pale Moon? Jandor's Ring? Break Open? Untaidake, the Cloud Keeper? Noggle Bridgebreaker? Fasting? Saprazzan Raider?...
I could see someone using this... perhaps... without any other wizards, or who needed something to sacrifice.
Not easily playable, but its not total garbage so: * not */2
blood funnel, easily the worst card there is, which will never see play.
Ghor-Clan Bloodscale. Lol.
indentured oaf. Harder to play than noggle bridgebreaker, and with a worse drawback.
cyclopean snare. 5 mana to tap a creature.
Nightcreep
Greater forgeling
the list goes on, ravnica had some of the worst cards.
And I would say that there are many blocks far worse than Ravnica. Kamigawa, Homelands, Alara, the list goes on. Ravnica was cool, fair, and flavorfull. It was also home to fantastic cards, a masterpiece of a set.
It is very playable- it only costs two mana. Since when are we expecting Blue creatures to roll up their sleeves and man-handle other creature. That Power/Toughness to Converted Mana Cost ratio stuff is not really for Blue (with a few exceptions). So for two mana you get a dude and a dude he is.
What better way to show you're a BAMF than to Terror someone's Akroma??
1/5 Stars