Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Territorial Dispute

Multiverse ID: 19718

Territorial Dispute

Comments (11)

DaaNz
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
that's terrigas
Hydrogoose
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (6 votes)
Strictly worse than storm crow
Exuberance
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (1 vote)
I could see this working in a land destruction/denial deck that has a hard to block or remove threat and a way to get land on the field without actually "playing" it. Maybe Frontier Guide? And boost out to this and a Plated Slagwurm?
demongodshinma
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (4 votes)
Crucibal of Worlds...done deal, now we can go home.
channelblaze
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Actually, it's not great with crucible. Given that you can't play lands, that means you can't play lands from your GY. You have to get rid of a land each turn.
tcollins
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Use it with creatures that fetch lands for you such as Farhaven Elf, or creatures such as Sakura-Tribe Scout. Maybe in a token deck with Life and Limb? It could really hurt opponents if you find a way to cheat this enchantment into play (Academy Rector or a similar effect?) but really if you're going to do that there are better enchantments to fetch.
Wulfsten
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Shouldn't have had the drawback. That is all.
altf4ninja
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Eon hub. Let's counter lands >:D.
pedrodyl
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Yes Eon Hub, this, and land destruction= you're opponents are pretty much screwed.
Raexs
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Haha. I decided to run this in my RedWhiteBlue commander deck. I threw this down on the board alongside Eon Hub, Strip Mine, and Peacekeeper. Then, when the board was pretty calm, along came a Cataclysm, and I chose to keep only those said cards, in turn ruining that game for everyone.