Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Burn the Impure

Multiverse ID: 213771

Burn the Impure

Comments (34)

lorendorky
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
yes PLEASE
Wraique
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.9/5.0) (4 votes)
Aye, too narrow, much like Feast of Blood.
Kryptnyt
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
Because if flame DID kneel to phyrexia, we'd have burn cards that have infect!
Looking at cards like Puncture Bolt and Puncture blast infect burn would be very high costed if it hit players.
SeiberTross
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
How this card reads to me:

Dear Red,

You will be seeing a lot more infect after Besieged.

Sincerely,
-Wizards
chinkeeyong
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (2 votes)
A neat Incinerate variant. Amazing in limited.
themlsna
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The art reminds me of Minion Reflection. I wonder if that was intentional, and if so, why?
Gezus82
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.6/5.0) (7 votes)
wow, a strictly better incinerate gets 2 stars... whats the world coming to?
draco_nite
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (8 votes)
5/5 for flavor text.
sarroth
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
This set needed more anti-infect cards like this and Melira's Keepers for Mirrans to stand a better chance. I love rooting for the underdog and all, but I also don't like lost causes.
DacenOctavio
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Wow, this is funny, because red already is good against infect. Why didn't we get a colorless burn spell in the last block that could actually deal with real infect menaces?
Anubisisking
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (4 votes)
Horrible art... thats supposed to be hands of the praetors btw...
M@tttyZ
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@gezus82: This is pretty much strictly worse than incinerate unless against an infect deck. Doesn't hit players unconditionally. It is arguably more fun than incinerate though, more satisfying to pull off so to speak.
Mata-nui3
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
How does FLAME cut something in half like this?
Keiya
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
@Gezus82: It's definitely not "strictly better" than Incinerate. It can only damage players (in addition) if the targeted creature has Infect, which when taken to formats like Legacy and Vintage, is VERY unlikely...
Gavrilo
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Nice burn spell. But why it depicts screwed viashino? Or is it phyrexian denouncer?
SolidSoldier
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
BURN THE HEATHENS!!!!
Worldwalker1
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
Much less effective outside Mirrodin, but in it it pulls double duty.
Anyone else think it looks like a buzz-saw made of fire? (which is just awesome)
franconbean
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
It stays on my sideboard generally, but if i know I'm going to face an infect deck player, it comes right out :D
Richard_Hawk
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
this should be in main if you're running red limited, period.
Feralsymphony
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Oh, I beg to differ. Flame, just like all else, shall serve Phyrexia in the end.
Enchantment_Removal
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
"Draw a card."
rawsugar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
hehe at first glance i thought it said burn the umpire:P
dragonking987
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Moleland
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Compare to volcanic hammer... Which is better?
Robert_G
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
An absolutely perfect sideboard card.
Macsen
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.8/5.0) (2 votes)
I dunno how I feel about this. Infect is good, for sure, but the creatures cost a lot and don't have the most amazing abilities. Does the game really need cards like this to be balanced?
LordofAwesome33
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
How I see any Mirran Vs. Phyrexian battle going down.

Player 1: "I'll play a mountain and end my turn."

Player 2: "I'll play a forest. Tap and play Sol Ring. Tap Sol Ring and play an Ichorclaw Myr"

Player 1: 0_0! "I'll play a plains and tap both my lands and play Burn the Impure. KILL IT!!!! KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!!!"
NuckChorris
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
According to this, Necrogen Scudder and Blistergrub are pure enough. I like the card, I just think this is a perfect time to take a lesson from Arabian Nights and mix flavor and function together. Instead of Infect, have it punish the Phyrexian watermark cards.
Player_000
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Great in limited, a decent burn spell anywhere else.
chrisAAMO
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Just to troll players, Wizards should have had a Phyrexian Crusader getting torched in the art.
XFlameMasterX
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@Gezus82: It's not strictly better. This can't hit players.
bay_falconer
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Nice flavor text. Major flavor fail with the name, though.

By the way, is it weird that Lost Leonin &c. get hit by this, and benefit from Honor of the Pure? They're purely impure.

(I should add that if you're playing RDW, suicide black, or suicide Rakdos, you really should have no trouble dealing with infect.)
RunedServitor
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I hate it when that happens.