9CMC AND having to tap AND then spend mana is just too expensive. 9 CMC is even more than reiver demon, which is far more devastating than this. 9 CMC for a flying 6/6 that you have to tap and invest lots of mana in is just not good enough imo. If it didn't have to tap...
A typical type 1 cost card. The p/t and abilites just arent worth the mana cost of 9. Now, if it was played CORRECTLY, in a GOOD dragon deck, with LOTS of support, it could work. The deck would have to be solid red however, so a Chill would devistate it. Although it would be nice for getting rid of cretures quickly if you have the mana. I personnaly would chose to wait untill turn 10 and play two Lava Axes with a Fire Servant in play. Hitting for 20 is always preferable to doing 9 dammage to a creature.
garbagegatherer
★★★☆☆ (3.3/5.0)(5 votes)
If you see this card for the first time with this art, you will *never* love it.
finulanu
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Never been sure on this one. Quite good, but with a huge drawback in its mana cost.
Crag-Hack
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Definitely one of the more scary looking dragons...
Gabriel422
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Visara costs six and does it better.
Buderus
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Them LAZORBEAMS are everywhere...
Cyberium
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The original unused art for Crimson Hellkite in Mirage expansion was Dragon Mask. The story was that an artist friend of a developer attempted to draw an imposing dragon for Crimson Hellkite but ended up took the de***ion too literally, so the art went to the Mask instead.
Comments (10)