Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Kamahl's Sledge

Multiverse ID: 32229

Kamahl's Sledge

Comments (16)

Bibblesbun
★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (4 votes)
Just far to exspensive, but, if you can play it and you dont have threshold, well then, damn.
8 damage, 7 mana.... meh.
pumaman83
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (5 votes)
I'd rather have Fireball, even with Threshhold.
Champion_Kitsune
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
I'll take Lash Out instead...cut 4R off the cost, sacrifice 1 damage both ways, and have an equal or better chance of dinging my opponent.
Vedalken_Arbiter
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
I'd rather have Chandra's Outrage.
SlickDragon
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (3 votes)
Comet Storm laughs at this garbage. As does Searing Blaze. Pitiful really :"(
count_dorku
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Wow, that is ludicrously weak.
Todzik
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
Not as bad as Ember Shot. Don't you love commons with ridiculously high cmc? They always end up being bad.
blindthrall
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I actually thought it was good at first, but I always look at CMC last.
shotoku64
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I would love to play this card, but burn decks have better options, even at 7 mana. Try Cerebral Eruption for a similar and better effect.
MithosFall
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Strictly worse than 7 Lightning Bolts.
psychichobo
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
That's not a bad effect for.... 7 CMC!?
DoragonShinzui
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Kamahl, stick to swords.
001010011100101110
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
C'mon guys, it's a sledgehammer. I think red needs more diverse weapons than just spears and javelins.
SirLibraryEater
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
I find it a little amusing that people are hating on this, when with threshold, it's 8 damage for 7 mana. That's 2 mana better than Blaze, yet Blaze is rated at least 2.5 stars better than this.
konokono
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Lowest rated Sorcery as of Sep. 2013
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
If I'm paying that much for a sledgehammer, it had better come with starboard attachments and hyperdrive.