Glaciers

vileone01 2009-07-22

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)

this is a powerful enchantment, yet rarely needed.

GrimGorgonBC 2009-10-29

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

goblin hoser

Bouchart 2009-11-18

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

I imagine that Conversion would generally be easier to use.

pwdrrider 2010-02-20

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)

But now you can chose between WW and WU; some decks have a hard time with consistent WW

Zoah 2010-07-24

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

Grumble... Why isn't there a mono blue "make red player cry" card?
There is certainly a mono red card that reads "Target blue player cries" Boiling Seas

zositmos 2010-07-28

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

this is a good card for a sideboard lol mono red death

NARFNra 2010-12-26

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

Now this could be interesting... I still think they should of made a similar card for Cold Snap which read something like this:

FROZEN LANDS {2}{W}{U}
During your upkeep, pay 2 snow mana or destroy Frozen Lands.

All non-snow basic lands produce colorless mana.

Might be a little op'd...

Ava_Adore 2011-01-21

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

good bye valakut

scumbling1 2011-04-21

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

"Grumble... Why isn't there a mono blue "make red player cry" card?"

There are such cards: Volcanic Eruption & Chill. One destroys there lands and their creatures, and the other is damn-near impossible for mono-red to remove.

tavaritz 2011-05-26

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Conversion has two rulings, both applicable to Glaciers, but they aren't here. Why?

SirZapdos 2011-11-25

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

This card almost makes Aysen Highway sort of playable. Impressive.

dberry02 2012-02-22

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Now that's cold.

Lord_of_Tresserhorn 2012-03-06

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Would oh so totally have had the supertype Snow in Coldsnap.

It's a bit of anti-power creep that this is identical to Conversion but multicolor.

mr8658 2013-06-13

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Sunglasses of Urza

go ahead and sink two mana every turn I am fine with that.

Comments (14)