Pointed Discussion

Mata-nui3 2011-01-27

★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (6 votes)

Run with Titan Forge. congratulations, you win.

NinjaFish 2011-01-27

★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (15 votes)

Hes the guy that changes the batteries in all those artifacts.

SocialExperiment 2011-01-28

★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0) (5 votes)

Couple of these and an Everflowing Chalice could get just a little bit crazy.

Stray_Dog 2011-01-31

★★★☆☆ (3.1/5.0) (5 votes)

Is that a Sphere of the Suns he is infusing?

ZEvilMustache 2011-01-31

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)

Casual bomb. Do those even exist?

TerribleTony 2011-02-12

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)

My girlfriend got one of these and a Shriekhorn in a pack wars game we were playing (my favorite way to open fat packs) and milled me to death. I was in a bit of shock.

DacenOctavio 2011-03-02

★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (3 votes)

Energy Chamber, all of a sudden you can block things and die to Flame Slash. And now you seem to combo with Grand Architect, too. What happened?

Revelation666 2011-03-12

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)

I absolutely love this guy with Everflowing Chalice

lyle685 2011-03-13

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (6 votes)

Are you only able to add one charge to only one or can you add one charge ounter to many?

EternalLurker 2011-03-18

★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (3 votes)

Keep yourself alive at 0 or negative life with a Platinum Angel.

Drop an Eternity Vessel. It'll come into play with 0 charge counters no matter how much negative life you have.

Play this card. Put a counter on the Eternity Vessel.

Play Near-Death Experience and drop a land for the Vessel's trigger.

INCREDIBLY CONVOLUTED COMBOS FOR THE WIN

Can't see much other use for this overcosted card.

GruesomeGoo 2011-05-10

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

A little expensive, I would've liked to see the same card at 3CC, considering Energy Chamber is only 2 and less prone to removal.

Riki1232 2011-05-26

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

use this with everflowing chalice and Fireball and you could easily win

Kryptnyt 2011-07-15

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Coretapper is quite a bit more efficient.

tcollins 2011-08-11

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

The mana cost of {3}{U} really hurts this card... I think even as a 0/2 or 0/3 for {1}{U}{U}, he might've been more playable but investing {4} for a mechanic that is just flat-out done better by other cards is subpar...

Glunders 2011-10-17

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Tried running this in my standard proliferate/charge-heavy deck, and the reality is that it's just too slow. Not a bad idea, though.

kashonismw 2012-09-02

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

@NinjaFish: Exactly! that's why his staff has a 'hook' at the end, to pull out the batteries! :)