Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Pull Under

Multiverse ID: 78972

Pull Under

Comments (19)

Guest1467942152
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (2 votes)
Would be nice if cost 1 less, not saying its undercosted for its effect & being common.
SavageBrain89
★★☆☆☆ (2.7/5.0) (8 votes)
Zzzzzzzzzz...........uh? Its an expensive useless removal spell? Its nothing important, zzzzzz.......
Malachorn
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (4 votes)
Commons are all about limited and I hate to see cards like this get dissed as "bad" when the simple truth is that this is a beautiful card for draft/sealed and a great common card that was printed because of that.
Elysiume
★★★☆☆ (3.6/5.0) (4 votes)
The only real use for it (except as a wicked expensive killspell or weakener) is killing indestructible creatures.
Forgeling
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (5 votes)
With four Long forgotten's out it's a really big last gasp.
garbagegatherer
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0) (5 votes)
Even bad in limited. Removal is already doubtful at five mana. But six? Never!
Bandswithother
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0) (3 votes)
I would rather play Hex that late in the game, or All is Dust.
Imperialstonedragon
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0) (2 votes)
one of few cards which can take out indestructables
Shadoflaam
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.9/5.0) (4 votes)
Strictly worse than Dismember, well except for arcane which no one likes.
DacenOctavio
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0) (5 votes)
Dismember says hi.
Ezuna
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I'll still play this over Ember Shot
luca_barelli
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Just use Rend Flesh if you want arcane removal, seriously.
deggdegg
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
@Shadoflaam - not strictly worse, as it has Arcane (which you've noted), and a single colored mana as opposed to Dismember's "two". It's worse for sure, but not strictly worse.
ScissorsLizard
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
No, even in a draft/sealed, this is way too expensive. If you want to see a common, high-costed kill spell that works well in a draft, look at Violet Pall.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
5Black for situational removal in black? .5/5
omni8000
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
right around the same time this was made, they made a good card called Sudden Death...
Hunter06
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Could easily cost 2 less, but than again, its from Kamigawa block.
1/5 Stars
LordRandomness
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
While this card is pretty terrible, it gets points for being one of a few -/- effects for which -/- until end of turn ACTUALLY makes sense (unlike, say, Dismember)
MattLynn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I think they could pull off a 1BlackBlackBlack -6/-6 spell later on...the color heavy mana cost would help, to lower the CMC. If multicolored, maybe CMC 3 would work...like jund color cost for -6/-6. I just wanna take out Consecrated Sphinx without having to make it a Doom Blade or Unmake (or whatever), like usual. Besides, what should I do, as a darker type deck builder, run across Gideon Jura in creature mode? Must justify it costs "more" or is "harder" to cast then Dismember, though, so it must be CMC 3 or 4, but definitely not CMC 6 like this mofo - no matter how little colored mana symbols it has. It is still a black spell that basically gets through regenerate and indestructibility, but it shouldn't cost the same as an inflexible Disintegrate or Lava Burst. Lame.