this card is becoming more and more useful... :D not only do i get to rape your artifact, but now i also get to see your hand... insult to injury
Snaxme
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(10 votes)
Myr Landshaper
C'mooooooon, you know you wanna ;
Lateralis0ne
★★★☆☆ (3.6/5.0)(6 votes)
Snaxme's doin' it right.
Silverware
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
@ Th3_Dark_On3
That is quite a tricky little combo, kudos to you for discovering it.
Suprisingly the ruling for Clarion Ultimatum actully gives you your answer.
The card is left in the library.
"10/1/2008 If you find a card that isn't a permanent card while searching (for example, you chose an Illusion token and find the split card Illusion/Reality), that card remains in your library. "
Th3_Dark_On3
★★★☆☆ (3.6/5.0)(4 votes)
What happens if you get this with Clarion Ultimatum by searching for it by targeting a Splinter token that Splintering Winds makes?? @Silverware: Couldn't you still do the above during the timeframe in between the prerelease and the date the ruling was made?
Azazyel
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.7/5.0)(6 votes)
@The Dark One: You wouldn't be able to fetch this with Clarion Ultimatum by targeting a Splinter token from Splintering Winds. A "Splinter token" is a nameless creature that has "Creature - Splinter" as its card type and subtype, respectively. Tokens don't have names unless specified.
As an example, see Tolsimir Wolfblood. His ability puts a "Wolf token" named Voja onto the battlefield. Without the named clause, tokens put into play by a card or ability are essentially nameless.
ddde
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(2 votes)
Pairs really well with Mycosynth Lattice to get rid of a land and make sure they will never play any more of that land. If playing against a monocolor deck this can just about win you the game.
evilcheeser
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(4 votes)
@Azazyel: If you read the rulings on your own example: "10/1/2005 The token is named "Voja" and has creature type "Wolf." This is different from most creature tokens, where the name and creature type are the same."
armogohma
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(10 votes)
Liquidmetal Coating. You can cry now.
SeiberTross
★★★★☆ (4.1/5.0)(10 votes)
No, the correct statement is, "{T}Liquidmetal Coating. I don't ever want to play magic with you again"
STFU about "raping" things. You're overusing a term which has nothing but negative connotations.
Frenzy13
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Apparently, when Urza's block meets the Kamigawa block, we get something that isn't overpowered or underpowered, but something....BALANCED?!?!?!?
the_nonaffiliated
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
@Azazyel: Actually, tokens have the same name as their types if they don't have a specified name. However, the token still won't search out splinter because splinter cannot be put onto the battlefield due to it being a non-permanent. so it doesn't work that way
MasterOfParadox
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
On it's own, this card sucks. Turn their crap into artifacts, however... I'M AFRAID YOU ARE STUCK WITH 4 OR 5 BASIC LANDS FOR THE WHOLE GAME.
Comments (17)
not only do i get to rape your artifact, but now i also get to see your hand... insult to injury
C'mooooooon, you know you wanna ;
That is quite a tricky little combo, kudos to you for discovering it.
Suprisingly the ruling for Clarion Ultimatum actully gives you your answer.
The card is left in the library.
"10/1/2008 If you find a card that isn't a permanent card while searching (for example, you chose an Illusion token and find the split card Illusion/Reality), that card remains in your library. "
@Silverware: Couldn't you still do the above during the timeframe in between the prerelease and the date the ruling was made?
As an example, see Tolsimir Wolfblood. His
If you read the rulings on your own example:
"10/1/2005 The token is named "Voja" and has creature type "Wolf." This is different from most creature tokens, where the name and creature type are the same."
"{T}Liquidmetal Coating. I don't ever want to play magic with you again"
Turn their crap into artifacts, however...
I'M AFRAID YOU ARE STUCK WITH 4 OR 5 BASIC LANDS FOR THE WHOLE GAME.