Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Yamabushi's Storm

Multiverse ID: 50346

Yamabushi's Storm

Comments (11)

Mode
★★☆☆☆ (2.6/5.0) (4 votes)
Could at least have been an instant and/or arcane i guess...
Captain_Willow
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (3 votes)
Yet saprolings are removed from the game anyway!
magog360
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (10 votes)
Would be kinda funny with Death Pits of Rath in play.
Ideatog
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0) (2 votes)
You could use Death Pits of Rath to get more out of this, but it's a whole other color and a much higher mana cost. Try Inflame instead- 3 damage to everything instead of 1.
Discoduck
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
Could be fun in the right Godhead of Awe deck, with anything that pumps your own creatures' toughness even a little (yay white).
Imperialstonedragon
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
will consider it as 1dmg to all for 2cmc
supershawn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.6/5.0) (10 votes)
strictly worse than pyroclasm
kazenpaus
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@supershawn: No, it is not in any way strictly worse than Pyroclasm. Do you even know what that phrase means? This removes creatures it kills from the game, and even if it didn't do that the double-edged nature of these cards means it would still not be strictly worse than Pyroclasm. In a deck with lots of 2 thoughness dudes this is infinitely better than Pyroclasm, for example.
PauperCubist
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Meh. Exiling burnt-out creatures just isn't that relevant during most of my drafts. I'll stick with Rain of Embers. Every point of damage you can squeeze in against an opponent counts when you're playing burn.
Cyberium
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (2 votes)
Permanently remove all Bloodghast on the field.
leomistico
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I would really like to see this in a X spell

Yamabushi's Firestorm
Variable ColorlessRed
Sorcery
Yamabushi's Firestorm deals X damage to each creature. If a creature dealt damage this way would die this turn, exile it instead.

Now, it would be perfect!
As it is, it's too much conditional, but the effect is really nice...!

3/5