The upkeep cost is funny because it won't live long enough for it to be a problem :P
Gaussgoat
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(3 votes)
If you played it when you're creatures had haste, this definitely isn't too bad. By itself though, easily blocked and probably dead as fried chicken with the 2 toughness.
The upkeep definitely hurts.
2/5
Kefra
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
2 toughness definitely limits its usefulness. If I wanted a big green creature with an upkeep cost I'd go for Darba instead -- 4 toughness means it'll probably live long enough for you to actually need to pay the a few times.
Because, let's face it. Anything with 2 toughness isn't going to stick around till your next turn anyway.
Psuedonaut
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
This + Concordant Crossroads + Eon Hub. Not the most fantastic combo however, but useful in the right deck if you've got space. If it had flying, or unblockable, it'd be much better. Otherwise, I can only view it as a wall-destroyer or a one turn sacrifice attacker.
Buderus
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
I would try it with Ooze Garden, 6 Mana a Vanilla 6/6... i know.... meh ;D
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
This guy did see quite a bit of play back then. A kind of poor man's green Ball Lightning.
Laguz
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Wow! That's terrible! Also, that's either the smallest barn ever or the biggest dude ever.
wideyes
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I remember getting a surprising amount of play out of this guy. Ah, Homelands... the things we did for you.
Comments (11)
The upkeep definitely hurts.
2/5
Because, let's face it. Anything with 2 toughness isn't going to stick around till your next turn anyway.