Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Leviathan

Multiverse ID: 26619

Leviathan

Comments (7)

nORMAL00
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Fun, but too expensive to keep as a pet.
Ace8792
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
You sacrifeced 4 islands to do 10 damage but wait i play a Fog. This is way to expensive to be practical.
Josh4567
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Isnt the fact that it costs 9 cmc a drawback enough
psyklone
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
How is that not flying? Its coming out of the sky ffs!
divine_exodus
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Change the art!! Please! No wait...that would mean reprinting it...NO!!! Don't do it Wizards!!!
allmighty_abacus
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (5 votes)
I would like it if WotC really explored this side of blue more- enormous terrors of the deep, impossibly ancient and impossibly powerful; capable of devouring fleets and even whole ports on a whim.

I would really really enjoy it it if WotC didn't feel the need to tack on horribad drawbacks to these unspeakable spawns of the depths.
VampireCat
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
One of the old huge impractical creatures. Pretty much useless now. Grozoth in Ravnica was a deliberate throw-back to this card, but with a less impractical attack cost.

Of course now, Artisan of Kozilek is a much better 9 drop, and Inkwell Leviathan is almost always going to be a a superior choice when Quest for Ula's Temple goes off.

Even in my Lorthos, the Tidemaker EDH sea monster deck, I can't find a way to make him playable.