You sacrifeced 4 islands to do 10 damage but wait i play a Fog. This is way to expensive to be practical.
Josh4567
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Isnt the fact that it costs 9 cmc a drawback enough
psyklone
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
How is that not flying? Its coming out of the sky ffs!
divine_exodus
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Change the art!! Please! No wait...that would mean reprinting it...NO!!! Don't do it Wizards!!!
allmighty_abacus
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(5 votes)
I would like it if WotC really explored this side of blue more- enormous terrors of the deep, impossibly ancient and impossibly powerful; capable of devouring fleets and even whole ports on a whim.
I would really really enjoy it it if WotC didn't feel the need to tack on horribad drawbacks to these unspeakable spawns of the depths.
VampireCat
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
One of the old huge impractical creatures. Pretty much useless now. Grozoth in Ravnica was a deliberate throw-back to this card, but with a less impractical attack cost.
Comments (7)
I would really really enjoy it it if WotC didn't feel the need to tack on horribad drawbacks to these unspeakable spawns of the depths.
Of course now, Artisan of Kozilek is a much better 9 drop, and Inkwell Leviathan is almost always going to be a a superior choice when Quest for Ula's Temple goes off.
Even in my Lorthos, the Tidemaker EDH sea monster deck, I can't find a way to make him playable.