I love the art and the flavour text but Peregrine Griffin doesn't have eagle's wings. It has falcon wings. But I'm just nit picking
MrBarrelRoll
★☆☆☆☆ (1.3/5.0)(3 votes)
I think they got the power and toughness confused, unless they MEANT for this to be unplayable dredge.
yyukichigai
★★★☆☆ (3.6/5.0)(6 votes)
Seriously Wizards, why do you insist on making Griffins horrible? Would it kill you to print some worthy of at least uncommon rarity?
pigknight
★☆☆☆☆ (1.2/5.0)(4 votes)
Didn't help in my sealed Tourney, and to expensive for a draft deck. Sorry bub, but I'm giving you a .5/5.
don_miguel
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
2/4 don't really care a lot of first strike. vigilance or 3/3
RDorothy
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Should've been a 4/2, not 2/4 with first strike. With 4 toughness it probably won't die anyway.
lorendorky
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Moot
Tiggurix
★★★☆☆ (3.9/5.0)(4 votes)
I find it funny that other commenters call this "dredge". It seems strictly average to me. In other words, exactly 2.5 stars. Really, people, does every creature need to be a Baneslayer Angel?
Gabriel422
★☆☆☆☆ (1.2/5.0)(2 votes)
Yes, for 5 mana I'd expect something on par with Baneslayer Angel. Sure this turns on the Griffin Riders, but it's just horrible when alone.
ArchAngel8
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
A devent Griffen. I would like to have some interesting effects on them though. Peregrine Griffin has a very nice body to carry its first strike, being a 4 toughness moster with first stike means not having to worry about trading with something and getting bolted. My one quip would have to be this. If you have flying how many monsters are going to stand in your way, really? Defensively this guy could be helpful, but it makes no since. Now if this guy was a 2/4 with vigilence he would be awsome, or if he was 3W instead of 4W.
Anyway I think its an average card that could have been much better with some planning. Looks like I will be still waiting for a good Griffen to build my Griffendore deck around...
a 3 out of 5
Lash_of_Dragonbreath
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
For everyone complaining about 2/4 first strike being a little pointless, it makes it a little more resistant than most of their suggestions. A 4/2 first striker would die to Lightning Bolt, Shock, Incinerate or anything among those lines, and a 2/4 with any other ability (vigilance, for example) would die to small creatures with Deathtouch like Acidic Slime or anything powered up by Onyx Mage. I know I'm only being an ass, but it's true.
It still sucks, though.
grynning
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The worst of the 4 griffins in standard right now, though not completely unplayable. It's odd that there aren't more of them, given the printing of Griffin Rider. I think maybe they should've done a functional reprint of Stormfront Pegasus with the griffin type to make that guy playable.
elhajjaj
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
5 drop 2/4 flying, first-strike COMMON in white? And a Griffin to boot? Awesome! 4.5 stars! This one will go right into my Griffin tribal deck; a deck that has been successful, even feared, in our group's multiplayer for a couple of years now. The deck has suffered from the Griffins' light backside, but this little jewel should cure some of that problem! Thanks, WotC, for tossing the Griffins a bone once in a while...
Binaro
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This card is actually a lot better than it seems. It's definitely great for picking off some red creatures that have a crap load of power but only 1 or 2 toughness.
And guys, please. Go easy on the commons. You can't compare a card worth not close to two quarters to a mythic rare.
Yukikah
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Of course it doesn't need to be another Baneslayer Angel. In fact, very glad it's not. But rather than compare it to Baneslayer, rather compare it to Serra Angel. Sure an uncommon instead of a common like this, but so much better for the same CMC. Something to be said about death-touch I guess, but still...
Kryptnyt
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
2/4 is fine. This thing is a nightmare in limited, it eats my Lightning Elementals all day.
LordDaiggsta
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Just look at this douche. "I don't know if you saw what I did there But I Am a f-ing beautiful specimen of a griffin Oh yes I am."
Enelysios
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
White usually has the most efficient small creatures, which makes it harder to justify things like this. Not an awful card, evasion and first strike are not a great synergy though, and low power first strike is further underwhelming. You are paying for each of these abilities and its just that the sum total is a bit of a mess.
Fine filler for limited, which is what I expect it was made for.
Comments (18)
My one quip would have to be this. If you have flying how many monsters are going to stand in your way, really?
Defensively this guy could be helpful, but it makes no since. Now if this guy was a 2/4 with vigilence he would be awsome, or if he was 3W instead of 4W.
Anyway I think its an average card that could have been much better with some planning. Looks like I will be still waiting for a good Griffen to build my Griffendore deck around...
a 3 out of 5
It still sucks, though.
And guys, please. Go easy on the commons. You can't compare a card worth not close to two quarters to a mythic rare.
"I don't know if you saw what I did there
But I
Am a f-ing beautiful specimen of a griffin
Oh yes I am."
Fine filler for limited, which is what I expect it was made for.