Hmmm...
Well, first, it's permanent, which is nifty.
Second, it's to play and to use.
I guess that equals a 3/5. Interesting alternative to Donate.
achilleselbow
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Obviously costs way too much to be usable when you could just cast Juxtapose instead, but if you must, use these with Bronze Bombshell or Jinxed Idol.
BastianQoU
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(3 votes)
i would honestly rather use mindslaver, at those costs..
SweetoothTKC
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Does the killing of the enchantments seem random to anybody else?
Buridan
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Interesting question SweetoothTKC I guess the enchantments are killed because they have enchanted their respecitve target in a way that is of use for their respective controller. When switching control of the permanents they simply say: "no, I don't want this negative enchantment on my new permanent nor this positive enchantment on my old permanent that is now controlled by someone else".
TheWrathofShane
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
Hey its definitely a playable card! Steal there bomb and give them a bronze bombshell or something! Can be game changing, with only mana invested over two turns.
Mode
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"Hey its definitely a playable card! Steal (their) bomb and give them a Bronze Bombshell or something! Can be game changing, with only 5 mana invested over two turns." -achilleselbow
Well, the problem here is the "only 5 mana invested over two turns" part. Your opponent has a turn to get rid of the gauntlets, or another turn to get rid of whatever you got from him, and still have a good amount of mana left for other stuff. Or he'll just get rid of you entirely while you're busy preparing the shenanigans in turn 5 and 6, which isn't too unlikely in agressive decks since, aussuming you want to keep your bombshell, you'll just have some defense from your first three turns.
YoungSloshee
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I will forever respect and hate this card.
I ran a changeling deck and cast a Reaper King while my opponents weren't running good creature removal decks (one with a white deck with two Swords to Ploughshares in the graveyard, and the other with an old-school artifact deck that messes with colorless mana). I was pretty confident in my position until Mr. Artifact pulled out the Gauntlets and traded my King for a 1/1 changeling token I made earlier with Crib Death.
Comments (9)
Well, first, it's permanent, which is nifty.
Second, it's
I guess that equals a 3/5. Interesting alternative to Donate.
I guess the enchantments are killed because they have enchanted their respecitve target in a way that is of use for their respective controller. When switching control of the permanents they simply say: "no, I don't want this negative enchantment on my new permanent nor this positive enchantment on my old permanent that is now controlled by someone else".
Can be game changing, with only 5 mana invested over two turns." -achilleselbow
Well, the problem here is the "only 5 mana invested over two turns" part.
Your opponent has a turn to get rid of the gauntlets, or another turn to get rid of whatever you got from him, and still have a good amount of mana left for other stuff. Or he'll just get rid of you entirely while you're busy preparing the shenanigans in turn 5 and 6, which isn't too unlikely in agressive decks since, aussuming you want to keep your bombshell, you'll just have some defense from your first three turns.
I ran a changeling deck and cast a Reaper King while my opponents weren't running good creature removal decks (one with a white deck with two Swords to Ploughshares in the graveyard, and the other with an old-school artifact deck that messes with colorless mana). I was pretty confident in my position until Mr. Artifact pulled out the Gauntlets and traded my King for a 1/1 changeling token I made earlier with Crib Death.
Oh, then he swung a Colossus of Sardia into my face.