Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Shard Volley

Multiverse ID: 152837

Shard Volley

Comments (13)

God_of_Destruction
★★★☆☆ (3.4/5.0) (4 votes)
Lightning Bolt with a land sacrifice setback... This is good if you are running a mono-red burn deck... 3/5
VirtueVsVice
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
This shouldn't have such a low rating. It's at least a 3/5.

Like GododDestruction said, good for mono- {R} burn.
Alqatrkapa
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
A recent article talked about sacrificing lands to help your Goblins. Go look at it under Daily MTG
Tommy9898
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.7/5.0) (3 votes)
Thunderclap is better.
Ragamander
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (7 votes)
It's like Lightning Bolt, only it's worse.
It's like Thunderclap, only it costs Red more and can target a player.
It's like Fireblast, only it deals 75% of the damage for Red more, which completely defeats the purpose of a card like Fireblast, so it doesn't really matter that you get to save a single land.

And, despite all of this, it's still rather good in Mono-Red burn decks.
boneclub
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0) (3 votes)
This is a piece of crap outside of MRB.

That said, this is Bolts 17-20 (Lightning Bolt, Chain Lightning, Riftbolt, and Lava Spike)

This is what makes Sports Car Burn Sports Car Burn.

4/5 for Burn, 2/5 for any normal deck, though I can see a Land Sac abuse deck with this, Fireblast and Life from the Loam.
redshoesrock
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
A decent card for Burn - 3.5/5

PS to Tommy9898 - Thunderclap only targets creatures; Shard Volley targets creatures and players. Shard Volley is better.
lorendorky
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is not a piece of crap outside MRB dude. If Valakut could play this in Std it would own. Not to mention using it with countryside crusher and/or seismic assault decks.
HairlessThoctar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Any card that can throw 3 damage for R or less is not bad.
OpenSeasonNoobs
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This was legal at the same time as Crucible of Worlds. Not a bad card AT ALL if you're running the crucible.
Fanaticmogg
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@lorendorky: Why? So that they could destroy their own combo? If a Valakut deck could benefit from this, they'd be running Lightning Bolt already, and they don't.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
With lightning bolt making an appearance back, I got to give this a 2.5/5
This is still good for red decks that only need 3 or so mana, they can run x4 bolts and x4 of these.

Edit: Just made a Modern RDW. This is my lightning bolt 12-16, and I have to change the rating to a 4.5/5. Freaking awesome card, 3 damage rocks! Who cares if you pitching a land if your going to win the game from it!
Tamerlein
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is a good card in RDW. Sure it isn't as powerful as Lightning Bolt, but it still works as a great supplement to the bolt. I almost always use this as my finishing burn spell so that the saccing a mountain drawback doesn't really do anything because the game is already over.

4/5