With this guy and Lightning Greaves out, all your creatures practically have Shroud.
makochman
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0)(5 votes)
It's a gal. Funny how they must have designed her with Skullclamp in mind. Yet another proof that WotC just don't playtest enough.
Gwafa_Hazid
★★☆☆☆ (2.6/5.0)(4 votes)
How exactly does this gal stack up under the M10 rulings? Suppose I had 3-4 creatures swinging and a Shuko attached to one of them, and this gal in play. Would I be able to give +1/+0 to all of them or just one of them?
Econael
★★★★☆ (4.7/5.0)(5 votes)
@Gwafa_Hazid: ad the end of the phase (when it matters), only one of them has it equipped ;)
If you plan on using the same equipment to bolster multiple creatures, you can't. Creatures don't deal combat damage in order. . . I think. . . If so, you could do that and respond to each creature's instance of combat damage. However, if damage is dealt simultaneously, as I said before, you simply can't.
I checked the rules; if something uses the stack, like a spell or ability, you can respond to it, but since it doesn't you cannot respond to it:
510.1. First, the active player announces how each attacking creature assigns its combat damage, then the defending player announces how each blocking creature assigns its combat damage. This turn-based action doesn’t use the stack.
Combat tricks ALL day. This guy + Lightning Greaves is absolutely brutal.
Arachibutyrophobia
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
omg lightning greaves is broken with this
Totema
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
@holgir: Actually, I would say that, if I were in this situation, all my creatures are in a selective quantum state of having shroud. So when do they actually have shroud? If an opponent is targeting something I own, it has shroud. If I'm targetting something I own, it doesn't have shroud, since i can de-equip at instant speed too. I suppose then all my creatures all practically have functional hexproof, which is just crazy to think about.
Ligerman30
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Gideon: I play Leonin Shikari and Lightning Greaves. Go. Chandra: *plays land for turn* hmmm Flametongue Kavu your Serra Angel? Gideon: Equip Lightning Greaves in response. Chandra: Uh ... this is akward ... Flametongue Kavu: Master what do I kill? I'm confused. *akward pause* Can I go now? Gideon: *Laughs hysterically* Chandra: This is why we can't be friends >_<;
Pipikako
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Sword of....
Shadoflaam
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
COME AND JOIN THE PARTY LEAVE ANXIETIES BEHIND WHEN THE WEIGHT OF ALL THE WORLD IS PUSHING DOWN
Comments (12)
Funny how they must have designed her with Skullclamp in mind. Yet another proof that WotC just don't playtest enough.
ad the end of the phase (when it matters), only one of them has it equipped ;)
Works well with Auriok Steelshaper
If you plan on using the same equipment to bolster multiple creatures, you can't. Creatures don't deal combat damage in order. . . I think. . . If so, you could do that and respond to each creature's instance of combat damage. However, if damage is dealt simultaneously, as I said before, you simply can't.
I checked the rules; if something uses the stack, like a spell or ability, you can respond to it, but since it doesn't you cannot respond to it:
510.1. First, the active player announces how each attacking creature assigns its combat damage, then the defending player announces how each blocking creature assigns its combat damage. This turn-based action doesn’t use the stack.
Chandra: *plays land for turn* hmmm Flametongue Kavu your Serra Angel?
Gideon: Equip Lightning Greaves in response.
Chandra: Uh ... this is akward ...
Flametongue Kavu: Master what do I kill? I'm confused. *akward pause* Can I go now?
Gideon: *Laughs hysterically*
Chandra: This is why we can't be friends >_<;
WHEN THE WEIGHT OF ALL THE WORLD IS PUSHING DOWN
JUST PUSH
RIGHT
BACK
...sounded like Louis Armstrong there...