Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Deep-Sea Serpent

Multiverse ID: 4258

Deep-Sea Serpent

Comments (13)

SavageBrain89
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0) (6 votes)
Sailors fear the serpent because it has a cmc of six and its a 5/5 creature that can only attack players with islands; others spite the Gods for allowing this card to exist.
AlphaNumerical
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0) (5 votes)
Another case of art wasted on a terrible card that will see no play.
Vizzerdrix80
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
Strictly better than Sea Serpent. It doesn't die when you don't control an island!
Sironos
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.8/5.0) (2 votes)
This drawback on most big creatures is what keeps me from playing blue.
HuntingDrake
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
strictly worse than Sea Monster
Kirbster
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
Dem colours.
PolskiSuzeren
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0) (2 votes)
I'm having trouble seeing how it's not STRICTLY worse than sea monster... It gets under ensnaring bridge easier? =/

However, saying it's strictly better than sea serpent is dumb. Sea Serpent only costs one blue, this costs two. So it's easier to get out. Sea Serpent can't be stolen by non-blue decks with things like Act of Treason, Threaten, etc.


I really wish people would stop using "strictly better/worse" arguments. There are very, VERY few cases where it really applies.
packmaster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
That art requires better playable card.
Sharpyarpy
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
yes it takes a deck specifically designed to use it but it doesnt mean that this card is not ever usable
DrJack
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Because Sea Serpent was too powerful. :-/
Trygon_Predator
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Really beautiful art, but an unfortunate victim of Magic's early creature design. Nowadays people just complain that creatures are overpowered. Nobody's ever happy. :/
Hunter06
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
5/5 for 6 is OK, Although usually I want to attack with something that size...
1.5/5 Stars