Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Temple of Epiphany

Multiverse ID: 380514

Temple of Epiphany

Comments (10)

RapSnitchKnishes
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
No Fedora?
j_mindfingerpainter
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I've been waiting a long time for you...
PEVE_O
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
I really dig the art on this card.
DaLucaray
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Izzet and Golgari were first of the guilds to be back- they got their own duel decks.

I guess that means they're the last to get a scryland.
RAV0004
★☆☆☆☆ (1.3/5.0) (3 votes)
I really hate the art on this card. It's bland.
generic lightning, generic temple, throw in some oranges and blues. DONE!
Fenix.
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Instantly the best Temple for Modern.
Melubb
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Well, like all scry lands - not great since it enter tapped, but I like the card in control setup
to get a better library control, which is essential, a 4 star card.
Syrtees
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
A temple for the colors that really need it.
StrayWanderer
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I was very excited when they released the first spoiler of a scry land, oddly giving us better mana fixing than our beloved Ravnica shock lands did in standard, at the cost of entering tapped. Then with the release of Mana Confluence, I understood the incredible range of color shenanigans available in standard at the moment - it is so vast that five color is viable, but really only effective as a splash on a three color. Decks can logically run only two white mana symbols in their deck as long as they wish to scry over having a mana a turn earlier. My only worry is that mono/dual colored aggro decks will be able to blow slightly slower decks out of the water, but there is always a price to mana fixing, entering tapped with deck control is not too high of a price for me.