this card is a little expensive but the fact that it destroys an enchanted permanent, means it could destroy either a land or creature, and upon destroying that, the enchantment goes with it.
holgir
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(2 votes)
You should definitely play this with Rancor or some other recurring aura to avoid a blank card in hand.
Mode
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(2 votes)
In other words, you get rid of an Aura and the permanent it's attached to. Doesn't sound bad actually.
ubii
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(2 votes)
too bad it's a sorcery.. i'd stick with desert twister since it's only one card out of my hand and doesn't need a combo to make it work... wouldn't want to risk my Rancor remaining on someone's creature just b/c i tried to pull this off...
achilleselbow
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(4 votes)
Yea, considering you need 5 mana to pull off the combo with Rancor, and even then it only works on creatures, it's worth paying 1 more for Desert Twister, which can destroy anything including planeswalkers. Or use Brittle Effigy for much more reliable removal.
Narim
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(2 votes)
It's actually not that bad... especially if you're playing mono-green, this could be pretty nice addition to your deck :) Sure, umbras somewhat limit it's potential, but it's still not so bad... but it lacks flexibility of Naturalize or efficiency of Back to Nature
chards
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Alternately, use Bequeathal to avoid card disadvantage.
Comments (7)