Necrotic Ooze + this + Pili-Pala = infinite mana. Plus his Forestcycling lets you dump him in the grave faster.
Lash_of_Dragonbreath
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Why are cycling cards from older sets much more playable than the ones in Alara? I'd like to chat with whoever decided that they would only put it in commons/overbalanced the cards sometime. This one is a nice way of getting nine mana on turn 5 or 6, or assuring you'll have a land to drop turn 3.
@Kelptic183: dude, I never thought about using this in my Necrotic ooze deck. Thanks.
Tiggurix
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
One can never have too many monstrous elves. ;)
Polycotton
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I run two of these in a casual cheesy green ramp deck containing 4x Fyndorn Elves, 4x Llanowar Elves and 4x Priest of Titania. To keep things interesting I only have two copies of Tooth & Nail in my deck. I'm sure one of my mates will get a Tremor one of these days...
Fanaticmogg
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This is pretty much a perfectly designed for EDH. It's costly (which isn't a big problem in EDH), it ramps a lot (since your other cards will be REALLY costly), and it can fetch Shocklands or the original dual-lands (or basic forests, if you're mono-coloured).
r2d2go
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
There's a few problems with this. One, green isn't a huge fan of using mana on other player's turns, so the GGG kinda clashes with the 4/5 body. Two, there are much more efficient rampers (obviously). It's playable, but 3.94 seems like a ludicrously high rating.
Comments (13)
T1: Forest, Llanowar Elves
T2: Forest, Fyndhorn Elder
T3: Forest, Elvish Aberration
T4: Forest, Krosan Cloudscraper OR something else equally lolhueg.
@Kelptic183: dude, I never thought about using this in my Necrotic ooze deck. Thanks.