Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Stone Golem

Multiverse ID: 205056

Stone Golem

Comments (31)

OutlawD1
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0) (6 votes)
Vanilla creature is vanilla
dudecow
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0) (5 votes)
Not very good, but I'll play it in every Limited deck I can. It's a reasonably sized dude that you will be able to cast once you have 5 mana.
A0602
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (6 votes)
Works fine in a multicolor deck. 4/4 for 5 is not outrageous.
ZEvilMustache
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (3 votes)
Not for constructed, unless we see some Golem love when we return to Mirrodin in the fall. But in limited, only green decks have something bigger at common.
UltimaCenturion
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (5 votes)
The only use of vanilla creatures is to actually attack and block, right? So who are non-vanilla things so much more useful for attacking and blocking? Oh, right, because we need cards that disappoint people when they open a booster pack.

Nice flavor, though.
But yes, vanilla creature is vanilla.
roqbthepirate
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
Golem solid like stone.
Eternal_Blue
★☆☆☆☆ (1.1/5.0) (15 votes)
utter trash; not worth the cardboard it's printed on. which is too bad, since you just spent 20 cents on it if you purchased a booster. good for limited? who cares.
Blackworm_Bloodworm
★★★☆☆ (3.1/5.0) (7 votes)
Should be a common.
Volcre
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.7/5.0) (3 votes)
This + Voltaic Key...
RPGsr4me
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.8/5.0) (2 votes)
I play green so, in comparison, not efficient at all.
kittyspit
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
redundant comment is redundant
AXER
★☆☆☆☆ (1.2/5.0) (2 votes)
Easy to cast once you have 2 Cloudpost.
Diachronos
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0) (3 votes)
Could probably fit nicely into an Artifact deck with Etherium Sculptor and Mycosynth Golem. Otherwise, it's inferior to most of the other 5cmc and 4/4s you could be using.

Might see some more use in Scars, though.
Test-Subject_217601
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0) (13 votes)
Why did the golem get stoned?
To take the Tectonic Edge off.
Magnor_Criol
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (2 votes)
A decent, solid card for limited. Should be a common, but I guess they didn't want every color to get common 4/4s for 5. I like the art and flavor text, as well.

I'm honestly surprised that it took this long for Magic to have a card named after something as classic as "stone golem," though.
Lavrant
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
I wish they'd just reprint ol' Obsi*** Golem, unautocardable though he may be.
scumbling1
★★★★☆ (4.4/5.0) (9 votes)
"good for limited? who cares"

Limited is where Magic brings in a majority of it's money. If you like this game, you should be greatful for healthy limited formats.
Drewsel
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
GOLEM SMASH... and that's it...
5/5
Evelisk
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Nice artwork Nice text Nice cost to power ratio so i guess its pretty nice
deadeye1387
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (6 votes)
No one seems to realize that 4/4 for 5 mana is a very good deal. Most 4/4s are either rare cards with some ability that makes their CMC 7 or 8, or 4/4s have a catch like "Stone Golem comes onto the battlefield tapped". A 4/4 with a CMC of 5 with no ability is a strong card.
Aronomizer
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Fangren Hunter
karathsaul
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
4/4 for 5 with no drawbacks. I see nothing wrong with this.
Tezz
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
UNCOMMON

WHAT THE ***
mikebeingmike
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I like him with those splicer cards.
Goatllama
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Hammer hands = flattened artificer. What golem wouldn't be angry if he couldn't pick anything up?
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
This card is good if your playing a lot of limited pools. In constructed its garbage. For the same price in constructed you can have a batterskull. Yes I just compared a mythic to an uncommon, in constructed it makes no difference.
space-coyote
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Nice solid card for casual play
LordRandomness
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
>implying the heart isn't a tangible part
Smokey790
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
So... This thing curves pretty nice at 4/4 for 5 colorless. It has no Drawbacks and solid Tribal support. On top of the artifact shenanigans. It's Killer in Golem and artifact decks, Pretty good deal in 4/5 colored decks and still a solid creature in most other decks.
Pretty Solid if you ask me.
car2n
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
A nice straightforward card. Back then , this would have cost 6 or 7.
OlvynChuru
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The flavor text doesn't make sense. Golems don't decide. Golems don't want. More importantly, it's hard to believe that the sculptor put his heart and soul into the creation of a golem which would kill him the instant it animates. That sculptor guy must be pretty crappy at golem-crafting.