TheFrostReaper 2009-05-01 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes) Please just play Hypnotic Specter over this card. Or even Abyssal Specter. Just don't play this card. Ever.
Buridan 2010-07-12 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes) pro: it doesn't need to be unblocked to discard a cardcon: too high mana cost - as kajillion said, it should cost 2 less
Baconradar 2010-08-25 ★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (4 votes) I'd say this is a 1.5 not a 1. You have to remember that 1 is for stuff barely bettern than wood elemental and 0.5 is for wood elemental. I'd take this over an outcast of numai or face of fear any day.
Grouchu 2011-05-24 ★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (2 votes) This is pretty bad, even for Starter. For that much mana, I would much rather play a Nightmare.
BastianQoU 2011-05-26 ★☆☆☆☆ (1.0/5.0) (1 vote) Turn 6 Chimney Imp :DI always wondered what would happen if they added 1 mana to Chimney Imps CMC, and this is a beautiful card for it.
Goatllama 2012-10-18 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) It is pretty impressive that it forces discard simply by attacking, but other than that.......
TwentyFifthBaam 2012-10-18 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Haha! Now you can't stop me from discarding your last card! Even though your 5/5 will negate any card advantage I may get whatsoever!Oh. You were holding an island?Well, alright then.1/5
Tiggurix 2014-01-05 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) It's a shame that this card is borderline unplayable, because that's one of the coolest illustrations I've seen on a Magic creature.
Comments (12)
con: too high mana cost - as kajillion said, it should cost 2 less
You have to remember that 1 is for stuff barely bettern than wood elemental and 0.5 is for wood elemental.
I'd take this over an outcast of numai or face of fear any day.
I always wondered what would happen if they added 1 mana to Chimney Imps CMC, and this is a beautiful card for it.
Oh. You were holding an island?
Well, alright then.
1/5