High pick in limited. Even if it was just a regular kicker and not a multikicker it would be great. With the option to get even bigger, you have an autoplay in any deck that plays green as more than a splash.
Ajani_is_da_man
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Beast in limited
JWolps
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(3 votes)
THIS THING IS ******* CUTE! MOAR! MOAR! MOAR!
BelloAbril
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(1 vote)
Grizzly bears that curves (quite bad) thanks to multi kicker. Average limited pick.
brunsbr103
★★★★☆ (4.7/5.0)(6 votes)
awwww my vote for the cutest card art
MasterOfEtherium
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
Baby Fluffies
dgregory
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
It's a bear! It's an antelope! It's fluffy! It's also not a bad creature at all given its versatility. Go ahead and play the bear if you need an early blocker but kicking it once or twice keeps it from ever really being a dead draw later in the game.
dudecow
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(7 votes)
Grizzly Bearss are fine in Limited. Hill Giants are fine in limited. This is both of them at the same time, and can be even bigger if you need it to be. 3/5, if only for its versatility.
f_fivefiftyseven
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
More versitile than Runeclaw Bear. Bit of a learning curve with multikicker since people will be tempted to wait a bit to kick it when the best play is the unkicked card, but once we get used to it it will be decent.
Gaussgoat
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Great artwork by Mr. Bodin, a decent card that is obviously an improvement over the equally common Grizzly Bear.
Certainly not the greatest creature in MTG, but not terrible either.
Looks kind of like bears. Would it have been a shame to make them Bear Beasts to give bear tribal a little more love: :<
Tommy9898
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Really brunsbr103? You must have never seen Bear cub.
SoulShatterer
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
I never got why people oppose multikickers so much, one of the girls in my casual group plays an elf deck with Joraga Warcaller as its centerpiece, and she has yet to play this card as less than a 5/5, usually greater. Elf decks produce enough mana to make this card vicious, given enough Llanowar Elves and Arbor Elves.
Diachronos
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
5/5 for being a decent card and for being freakin' pandas with horns.
Edit: when people mention "limited" when commenting on a card, it means that the card is garbage in any form of constructed 90% of the time.
count_dorku
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(1 vote)
With proliferate, it's either a bear, or it's a hill giant that gets bigger over time.
Imperialstonedragon
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(1 vote)
awwwww
gorgoncube
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(2 votes)
An Aura Gnarlid may be stronger, but is it fluffier? Is it?? Well, is it????
I'll hate to Kick it. It would be absolute animal cruelty to kick anything that looks like an angora rabbit.
occamsrazorwit
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0)(3 votes)
Multi-kicker on my green 2/2 two-drop? Gnarly.
BongRipper420
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Anyone who thinks this is the cutest card ever clearly forgot about Bear Cub.
DoragonShinzui
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
The almighty Omni-bear.
TheZombifier
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
"Ohh! Look! They are so cute and cuddly! Just let me touch it! ...AARRGGGHHH!!! MY ARM!!!"
gnarlid_pack_leader
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
a panda, a gazelle and a tasmanian devil combo that has a limitless power and strength in my infect and proliferate swarm simic deck. my favourite card in the game :)
Comments (24)
It's also not a bad creature at all given its versatility. Go ahead and play the bear if you need an early blocker but kicking it once or twice keeps it from ever really being a dead draw later in the game.
Certainly not the greatest creature in MTG, but not terrible either.
2.5/5
5/5
2/5
Edit: when people mention "limited" when commenting on a card, it means that the card is garbage in any form of constructed 90% of the time.
I'll hate to Kick it. It would be absolute animal cruelty to kick anything that looks like an angora rabbit.
...AARRGGGHHH!!! MY ARM!!!"