Siege Elephant. I thought green was more efficient than this.
ZEvilMustache
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(12 votes)
This makes 9 lizards in standard... Lizard.dek baby! And none of them are rare. Budget Lizard.dek, baby!
SolidSoldier
★★★★☆ (4.4/5.0)(4 votes)
Dreadful... but every card can't be epic, I guess.
D_king
★★★☆☆ (3.1/5.0)(4 votes)
wow people need to start appreciating the good ol' look at me I'm huge and cost huge. be glad they did this with a common, and with a somewhat fun kinda critter. we really didn't need another goliath sphinx, we do need a new vizzerdrix
blindthrall
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(5 votes)
Ahem. Blanchwood Treefolk. More useful creature type, and one stronger. Perfect example of power seep.
Yoto32
★★★☆☆ (3.7/5.0)(5 votes)
I don't trust anything that is not huge, becomes huge, makes other things huge, or powers out huge faster in Rise, and in Rise this is not huge. It's just a green Siege Mastodon
RafiqTheMiststalker
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(8 votes)
Just like the mythic rarity excuse for broken cards. It's a common, so it's allowed to be useless. That's messed up :/
so who wrote in and said they miss Ironroot Treefolk............cos it definatly wasn't me
count_dorku
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(4 votes)
Well, it could be worse. It could be Armored Cancrix. (That's not MUCH worse, it has to be said, but it is worse.)
Diachronos
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0)(3 votes)
@Ashamed: And Leatherback even has a useful Creature type!
LimePeel
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(4 votes)
Wow. This is just one of the worst cards I've ever seen. You sure don't get any bang for your buck with this one. Only reason I didn't score this card a 1.0 is because the art is kind of cool; a huge lizard about to swallow a whole deer with one gulp.
1.5/5
divine_exodus
★★☆☆☆ (2.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Looks more like a hippo...but then again "creature--hippo" is even worse than "creature--lizard"
InternetNinjacy
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(3 votes)
Does anyone else notice a hippo's head on a T-rex's body?
MasterOfEtherium
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0)(3 votes)
Wayne Reynolds Does The Most Amazing Art No Matter How Crappy The Card
Anubisisking
★★★☆☆ (3.4/5.0)(4 votes)
Great art.
Hoonster
★☆☆☆☆ (1.2/5.0)(2 votes)
This is down right useless . I would have given 2/5 if it was 5/3 . . .5/5
land_comment
★☆☆☆☆ (1.8/5.0)(2 votes)
I aggree, Ashamed:
CAN'T FIGHT THE WORLDWAKE POWER!!!!!!!!!!
DysprosiumJudas
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(2 votes)
Want a worthless green vanilla five-drop? You're better off with Rotted Hystrix. While not strictly strictly worse, Nema Siltlurker is more or less the same card with one less toughness and a much less relevant creature type. Both of the aforementioned cards will waste your time, but Nema Siltlurker gains the unenviable title of being a card so worthless that another worthless card outclasses it in every regard.
HuntingDrake
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Am I the only one who always misreads this card's name?
HairlessThoctar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I was told the formula for costing vanilla dorks was "power + toughness should not exceed CMC"
This should have been 4.
Radagast
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I understand that most cards cannot be tournament worthy, and I understand that draft formats need basic, utility cards, but come on - junk like this was barely playable when the game first game out. Give it something - anything! - to make it more than an Ironroot Treefolk that showed up over 15 years too late to the party.
Comments (25)
That's messed up :/
2/5
And Leatherback even has a useful Creature type!
1.5/5
I would have given 2/5 if it was 5/3 . .
.5/5
CAN'T FIGHT THE WORLDWAKE POWER!!!!!!!!!!
This should have been 4.