Not enough cards' flavor text involves the mating rituals of fictional creatures.
Dark_Monkey_316
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(3 votes)
Ha yes, a staple in every mono green (and even found in a splash of green decks as well). Obviously I'm dating my self when I talk about this card. As I look at the card now CMC 5 for a 3/5 doesn't seem like a good trade nowadays.
Razbot
★★★★☆ (4.4/5.0)(4 votes)
5 for the flavor alone
blindthrall
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
See that expression?
He's got wood.
Kryptnyt
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(3 votes)
Can't stop the ladies from wanting to touch my ironroot treefolk.
Anathame
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
As bad as he was back in the day, he's even worse now.
Mike-C
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(1 vote)
He wasn't bad back in the day! He was a casual killer! 1st MTG card I ever saw too.
DritzD27
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
There was a copy of this card at my mother's house when I was growing up. I had no idea what it really meant as a kid. Later in life I remembered that the card was still in the attic with some books. I asked my sister to retrieve it only to find out it was this. Sadface.
MechaKraken
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
You know a flavor text is good when you find yourself wondering what it has to do with the card's actual performance in the game.
Comments (11)
He's got wood.
Strictly worse than it. And unlike many instances in which the terms "strictly" are used, the creature type remains constant.
And that flavour text is... err, I can't say much about it.