Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Entangling Vines

Multiverse ID: 189901

Entangling Vines

Comments (18)

ZEvilMustache
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I've never liked "doesn't untap" effects in green. It does free up card slots in blue, though. That has to count for something.
Oleander
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0) (2 votes)
This card was unused as a blue (Glimmerdust Nap) and in blue you can actually tap your opponent's creatures with spells. In green, it's just pointless and leads to a lot of hoping that you can cast it on the creature you want when the opportunity presents itself.
JackP
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (2 votes)
a worthless version of Black -- Paralyze
Vorthosian
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (6 votes)
Out of all of MasterOfEtherium's comments, this is the only one I've seen where he doesn't capitalize the first letter of every word.

M10 hates the color pie.
UltimaCenturion
★☆☆☆☆ (1.8/5.0) (6 votes)
MasterOfEtherium, your grammar is irritating and makes it really difficult to read what you're saying. And I mean REALLY difficult.
As for this, I'm glad my deck can kill and raise stuff back from the dead. (Though maybe I should think about getting some enchantment killing cards.)
Iiory
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
it`s ok ,oooooooh come on imagine some of theese with some awaykeners.... the forest itself is on the march of war
GearWarriorK
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This card is useful for when your opponent has his best creature out. Using this on a weeny will just get you laughed (or snickered) at. 4 mana seems extreme to me, would have been better if it were just for 2.
rubber
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
And I thought Dehydration was bad. Did this really need the "enchant tapped creature?" Sure it's green removal, but if you need removal badly enough to use this, you should splash another color. Deathtouch creatures are usually a perferable alternative.
Haze01
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
So... as soon as I untap my creature with Twiddle, Seeker of Skybreak, or the like, this Aura is removed because it's no-longer enchanting a legal target?
LimePeel
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Too much mana for what it does. I would try using this card if it was 1 mana, or even 2 mana, but since it's not.....

1. 5/5
mikluemp
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I'm considering that this would be good in EDH as a more long term solution to certain generals.
themlsna
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
I'm so tired about hearing about the color pie and cards having to belong to certain colors.
thaviel
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
control in my green? more likely than you think.
MasterOfEtherium
★★☆☆☆ (2.1/5.0) (7 votes)
People Should Be Greatful This Is Green Removal Here Folks
Gabriel422
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I misread it during M10 prerelease and cast it for 2G, and no one noticed. This is how bad it is.
nevenshinko
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I like this card. Great art, great flavor, and its a green pseudoremoval. Its not arachnus web but I like it.
imsully2
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The color pie doesn't mean that you can't have certain effects in any color but one, simply that they're easiest to access cheaply and fairly in that color, if this card was blue it would be worthless garbage without a doubt, but for an ability you don't usually find in green, it's alright, not great, there are better alternatives but still decent
omni8000
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Is it good? Well no, but it is green removal so I am not going to hate. If we got a red hard counter for 5 mana I wouldnt hate either because you just dont get that. Problem here though is with stuff like beast within and prey upon green is getting better for removal and red still doesnt have its 5 mana hard counter... oh yeah and a way to get rid of those @%#$ing enchantments