Conveniently enough, Replenishing and Aura of Silence still takes up two cards. That and it requires at least twice as much mana.
VampireCat
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0)(3 votes)
Not particular useful since it fizzles if your opponent only has one enchantment - which is pretty common.
adrian.malacoda
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@VampireCat: Even worse, if your opponent controls only one enchantment and you control at least one enchantment, you are required to target one of your enchantments. Since white is the enchantment color, that has a good chance of happening.
Kelptic183
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Or, if your opponent doesn't have two enchantments, don't cast this card. Just because it's in your hand doesn't mean you have to cast it.
Of course, it's still not a very good card. It's all right in larger multiplayer formats like EDH, but it's probably outclassed by Return to Dust. 2.5/5
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Its impossible to cast this card online if there is only one legal target on the field.
Anyways, sideboard card for an enchantment deck, incase of mirror matches. Or for a player with a limited card pool.
Goatllama
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
omg radiant just get over it and stop destroying so many enchantments
gut.gemacht
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Not so useful these days since more equipment is fulfilling the roles of enchantments. I'd certainly think about sideboarding one for enchantment heavy decks though.
Comments (9)
That and it requires at least twice as much mana.
Of course, it's still not a very good card. It's all right in larger multiplayer formats like EDH, but it's probably outclassed by Return to Dust. 2.5/5
Anyways, sideboard card for an enchantment deck, incase of mirror matches. Or for a player with a limited card pool.