Some sort of Pandemonium for Spirit decks. The big drawback is that you can't target any players, therefore it's a bit expensive in general. You'll do nicely if you only use spirits with shroud or many cheap ones, though.
holgir
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(1 vote)
Hm, I would prefer to play this enchantment with non-spirit creatures and utilities to turn opposing creatures into spirits (Imagecrafter, Unnatural Selection).
@Tommy9898 that doesn't work, the enchantment isn't doing the damage, it is the creatures.
CeremonialBathory
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Spirit EDH deck, maybe? o_O
HairlessThoctar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Much better off in a spirit deck, as they can recoup their loses with Soulshift.
OmegaSerris
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@Tommy9898
No, use Mark of Asylum. It's cheaper and it will work in this situation. Toss in some Hammerfist Giant and some Volcanic Fallouts and your army is the only one that will be left standing. :-)
Thasheej
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I use it in a deck with 4 Glitterfangs as my only spirits. At that point It's just a renewable lightning bolt that only targets creatures. Not the worst removal in the world.
pedrodyl
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
No matter how you play it, this card has a draw back. Which is stupid, because it's just a lousy enchantment. Thanks Kamigawa block...
corkscrew
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Oh, come on, it has its uses. If nothing else, it's one more wonky card that you can throw in a changeling deck. Unless they themselves are using changelings, you'll always hit their guys for 3, and they can never hit you back.
Comments (11)
The big drawback is that you can't target any players, therefore it's a bit expensive in general.
You'll do nicely if you only use spirits with shroud or many cheap ones, though.
No, use Mark of Asylum. It's cheaper and it will work in this situation. Toss in some Hammerfist Giant and some Volcanic Fallouts and your army is the only one that will be left standing. :-)
Not the worst removal in the world.