Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Rolling Stones

Multiverse ID: 5212

Rolling Stones

Comments (15)

DJcopydog
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (2 votes)
Definitely a surprise card to play... especially if you have something like a wall of fire in play. Can be sneaky if played at the right time.
majinara
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes)
Many creatures with defender ain't walls anymore. They should reword it to "creatures lose defender".
qaq456
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (3 votes)
wow just went from several walls from an animate walls page to this.... its like magic geddit?
Enemy_Tricolor
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (3 votes)
This card gives me a lot of satisfaction.
TheHandyman
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
Hello, Illusionary Wall. Almost makes up for the kumulative upkeep. Almost.

"People, why are we fighting?" - Mick Jagger
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Squashed goblin for teh lulz!
desolation_masticore
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
7/4 flying first strike for 3Blue definately makes up for the cumulative upkeep. It will probably end the game before it matters.
Kale_Eledar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)
Awesome, now my narrow group of walls that have a power greater than zero can have a mediocre deck built around them.
This seems like what Mark Rosewater would call a Bad Rare (TM.
TPmanW
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
What a wasted opportunity. None of the versions of this card have Rolling Stones lyrics as flavour text? Not even a vague reference? Something about "satisfaction", or painting the walls black? No mention of a beat of burden or a nervous breakdown or anything?

That said the flav text itself isn't so bad. I know the art is supposed to be flowstone or something but it looks niether like a rock that is rolling or even a wall.
bantar
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Type your comment here.shifting wall, fling,and, finally, coat of arms has a purpose. It's the only one of its kind. I really like the card for its creativity.
Goatllama
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Time to rock 'n roll.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Doran, + walls?
raptorman333
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Travelsonic
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@Kale_Eledar
I personally think this is a very limited, narrowminded view - granted, a wall deck would probably require a little overhead, but attacking walls aren't completely useless IMO.
tavaritz
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Conceptually walls are immobile structures where as non-wall defenders are home guard. So you need magic to get walls to attack, but you need a order from superiors to get a home guard to attack.