Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Heartwood Shard

Multiverse ID: 46059

Heartwood Shard

Comments (10)

holgir
★☆☆☆☆ (1.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Is this the most useless of the cycle? I think so, closely followed by Pearl Shard.
kitsunewarlock
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (3 votes)
Extraordinarily weak. 3 mana to give a single creature trample is laughably weak. 3 and a Green makes you wonder why your not using Rancor or Primal Rage. Even in draft I don't see many possible uses for this. Why its an uncommon is beyond me. It should have untapped the creature or given it +1/+1 or something similiar. Doesn't even work well with Storm Crow.
Schlorgadorb
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Its not particularly strong, but it does stop your beefy creatures from being blocked by a 1/1 token and becoming useless. I can see plenty of uses, though I agree, it should have been a common.
Demage
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Just use Primal Rage instead.
land_comment
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
They couldn't think of anything else, so they printed this. That said, how many of you have found themselves thinking an Artisan of Kozilek needed trample? It's harder to find a non instant non sorcery trample card. Even garruk is one-time. (or every couple turns).
HuntingDrake
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This could have been Dragon Blood, and instead we got War Chariot.

Easily the worst of the cycle - Pearl Shard is actually pretty damn good.
TheAlucinaut
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Uncommon? Really?

If it were common it wouldn't encourage the same kind of disgust.

Huh.
tasteful
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
The Art On This Card Gave Me A Boner
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I think it should have at least passed out +1/+1 and trample. The +1/+1 would have made it passably useful, while the "and trample" would have added some interest to an otherwise dull effect.