Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Krosan Colossus

Multiverse ID: 39669

Krosan Colossus

Comments (17)

SavageBrain89
★☆☆☆☆ (1.4/5.0) (5 votes)
Average card. I mean you get what you pay for right? A 9/9 for 9cmc or 8 if its morphed first. Tremendous artwork and flavor text.
InsaneGiraffe
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
*cough* astral slide *cough*
Mustached_Stranger
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (6 votes)
How exactly do you hide that thing?
Shieldman
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@Mustached: Presumably you get your opponent to think you just played several Forests.
defuse
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
That's going to have a 5/5 for the flavor text and art.
GracefulInferno
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Can you imagine this dude erupting out of a morph spider?
Steinhauser
★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (6 votes)
He looks like Domo-kun.
mykatdied
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I'll never understand why scourge block made so many large creatures without trample. It's easy enough to give them trample but really waters down a deck having to assure it. Great with brawn and mongrel in madness though.
Ideatog
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Not nearly as broken as Void Rays...
candyapplecorn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I like this guy a lot more than Krosan Cloudscraper simply because this guy doesn't have an upkeep cost
observerofthecards
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Basically a nice example of simple, solid card design. Great art and flavor text, and you get what you pay for. Besides, there are so many ways to cheat it out, (as many people have already mentioned) that often you are getting what you didn't pay for.
stille_nacht
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
ah, old fatties, they were so awesome :

now we have karlonian behemoth, and its just not the same :/
Lord_Ascapelion
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Would trample have killed this card? Sucks to have your massive beast chump-blocked by squirrels all day...

Art and flavor text are amazing, though.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This guy needs to stop playing with his food and freaking charge at the planeswalkers (no trample)