+ Flying + Is a unicorn + Has Been around since alpha + Less black required (Though doesn't really count seeing as you only run them in mono-black, unless you run Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth and you want to use these guys for some reason) - Costs 2 more
Leeches
+ Costs less - No flying - Leeches are ugly
So discounting all the trollish arguments, it's really a case of would you pay 2 more for flying on your fatty?
captainnermy
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
So this is an uncommon Nightmare for two less, and all it loses is flying? Am I missing something?
RedJaron
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
The card name alone makes me feel . . . uncomfortable.
When I saw this I instantly thought of the leech guy from Resident Evil Outbreak.
Anyone?
Fenix.
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Requires you to shove quite a lot of swamps in your manabase to not suck.
SlushyJones
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Pretty good in mono-black decks, I can dig it. Get this guy as a 4/4 on turn four, which isn't bad. He gets better as the game goes on, which is a problem for a lot of creatures. On turn 6 you he's a 6/6 while you Corrupt an opponent. Not bad.
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Squeeches.
Arachnos
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@BorosGreengrocer: And Lashwrithe aka Squelching Lash
Comments (13)
This was the only card in the set that deck was excited about. (Gluttony is too disadvantageous)
Plays well with Squelching Pegasus.
Nightmare
+ Flying
+ Is a unicorn
+ Has Been around since alpha
+ Less black required (Though doesn't really count seeing as you only run them in mono-black, unless you run Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth and you want to use these guys for some reason)
- Costs 2 more
Leeches
+ Costs less
- No flying
- Leeches are ugly
So discounting all the trollish arguments, it's really a case of would you pay 2 more for flying on your fatty?
Yes, you're missing Lashwrithe.
Anyone?