This is mean because if an opponent controls enough creatures to kill themselves, you can kill them!
Sooku
★★★☆☆ (3.9/5.0)(5 votes)
This is a win card. Expensive as hell to play and very likely to be countered, but you pretty much win if you can resolve it.
Osmodius
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0)(4 votes)
Great against those damn Slivers...
metalevolence
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(4 votes)
this card feels so great to drop in casual, but be forewarned- use it often, and people might actually start bringing counterspells in their casual decks (blasphemy!)
PEVE_O
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(3 votes)
I once memory plundered this from my friends graveyard right after he used it. that was a really fun game.
Tommy9898
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(3 votes)
A win card with a win flavor text.
Auteur
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(6 votes)
One of those "play it and win" cards. One-on-one I like Searing Wind more, because if a red deck is somehow hanging around 8-9 mana the opponent probably doesn't have more than ten life anyway. Multiplayer, on the other hand... absolute insanity.
Ukkmaster
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0)(1 vote)
The trouble with it, is that a simple Fog or version thereof often just annihilate's this card. Great card, just too many ways to simple nullify the high cost of it.
EDIT: In retrospect, it's more like Threaten that hits everybody. Thinking of it through that lens, you pay almost 3 times as much for this but gain the potential for more than 3 times the effect (if your opponent controls 4 or more creatures). Nice.
Comments (12)
EDIT: In retrospect, it's more like Threaten that hits everybody. Thinking of it through that lens, you pay almost 3 times as much for this but gain the potential for more than 3 times the effect (if your opponent controls 4 or more creatures). Nice.