Enough is enough. Everyone who wants these has them. If you don't have them yet you can find them now for sure. Cycling lands are useful, but the pre-cons need to think of something new to include if they are to remain interesting.
Eluminas
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Is that a slime covered golf ball in the background? It's like Davy Jones' golf course out there! lol
@Eluminas and NeoSin Pretty sure that is a sewer grate.
MisterAction
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I'm not saying this is strictly worse than the Onslaught cycling cycle, but... why would you use this over Barren Moor? You wouldn't cycle this unless you already had plenty of , and if you already have a lot of you can afford to use one of them for cycling. I can't imagine a time where I'd want to pitch this but could only spend to do it.
Why not Barren Moor? No easy answer in the context of the deck, but in general, because Fluctuator.
Bbone37
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"I can't imagine a time where I'd want to pitch this but could only spend to do it."
Because you used your on an instant and had at opponent's EOT, but no ? Yes, the Onslaught cycle of cycling lands is generally better, but there are reasons to have this over/as well as the Onslaught cycle.
Comments (10)
Drifting Meadow
Remote Isle
Polluted Mire <-- You are here.
Smoldering Crater
Slippery Karst
Blasted Landscape
See also: Barren Moor
Why not Barren Moor? No easy answer in the context of the deck, but in general, because Fluctuator.
Because you used your