This look much better in this frame, but still sucks.
Magnor_Criol
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
I'm pretty confused why this guy was put in here. I guess so the dragons have an answer to Silver Knight's prot-red?
RedAtrocitus
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
My first choice for replacement when I got the deck, sub this out for Steel Hellkite.
JRE47
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(6 votes)
It's not great, but I wouldn't say it sucks. Yes, it's a bit expensive for those stats, but trample is pretty rare for dragons. In a dragon-heavy deck, especially with a couple Crucible of Fires, this can make for a nasty surprise. True, I'd rather have Steel Hellkite or Clockwork Dragon as a colorless splash-in, but this can be decent in a pinch.
Ninjazilla
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
5/5 for sheer adorability with its trample with only 3 power
pedrodyl
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(4 votes)
Dragons: Pretty b.a. creatures of at least 4 power w/ flying. Wurms: Also b.a. creatures with power of at least 5 and usually trample. Dragon Wurm: Apparently you get this guy and Elder Land Wurm. Yes, thank you WotC
Shadoflaam
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0)(1 vote)
The most depressing KvD loss I had while running Knights was a creature screw for both players, while my opponent had only this out. For 4 turns I had no defense and was at 8 life. It was quite hilariously sad.
KokoshoForPresident
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0)(1 vote)
It's a dragon wurm? Why not just call it a wyrm?
Ferlord
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I GUESS the colourless aspect makes this a great limited card, but otherwise, I didn't think they'd put in something like this as a dragon. I'd actually appreciate Furnace Whelp better in this deck, because it has the potential... this stays a 3/4.
Comments (9)
Wurms: Also b.a. creatures with power of at least 5 and usually trample.
Dragon Wurm: Apparently you get this guy and Elder Land Wurm. Yes, thank you WotC