Methinks Kiora will definitely appear soon with the printing of this
*excited*
DragonicSphinx
★★★☆☆ (3.9/5.0)(4 votes)
Love it! Need more enemy duals for Riku edh
Eddie_Antilles
★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0)(5 votes)
A nice dual land; just perfect for my four-colour Jace, Memory Adept milling deck.
TheDonMega
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(8 votes)
That artwork is gorgeous! I would love to live in Hinterland Harbour.
Splizer
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
How the hell does Hinterland prosper when their harbor is the craggiest, commercially unfriendliest stretch of meandering coastline on the entire plane?
I mean look at it! Getting a trade boat in there without a lighthouse peering over the cliffs must be like trying to lay your hand on a Blightwidow covered in Riot Spikes! Blindfolded!
Henrietta
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Hinterland is not a place. It's a geographical term.
TokenArmyCommander
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
Can this land be fetched by Caravan Vigil?
Trygon_Predator
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Finally, a new dual for my favorite color combination! And it's absolutely beautiful to boot.
Juicebox360
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Ah, I see.
And if shocks are indeed reprinted...
dlgn
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
I wonder what's across the sea from Gavony? More werewolves, vamps, zombies, demons, geists, angels? Or something entirely different? Or does it just double back to the other side of the same continent?
Lash_of_Dragonbreath
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Come along with me To a town besides the sea
This card reminds me of the Adventure Time ending song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJczYn2dvm4).
Taudisban
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(4 votes)
Dear Wizards,
Please print these dual lands at a lower rarity. I understand the Ravnica lands being printed at a higher rarity because paying life can be intimidating to newer players, but poorer players need good mana fixing. It shouldn't cost sixty dollars to build a multicolour deck that doesn't get mana screwed.
Thanks.
starzfire
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Defiantly going to see more play with with Simic out now, beautiful artwork to boot!
MICKEY.KNOX
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@JFM2796 You and dual lands must not get along very well... try this: trade. Of course most people won't trade lands but it doesn't hurt to try... Awesome land tho... this, Breed Pool, Watery Grave, Woodland Cemetery, etc. have my UBG mana base workin and lookin sweet...
jonrds
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
@Taudisban
I totally agree with you. Printing new types of dual lands isn't really reducing the price because people keep buying 4 of's to go in their decks that already had 4 of's of all the other dual lands. Reprints would go a long way towards reducing the cost, but its also not exactly in their interest.
This cycle was good design because it is more effective when you don't have the other dual lands. I personally think it should have specified basic land (so that it didn't work with typed dual lands), but I guess that would have been a rules-text nightmare.
Comments (17)
*excited*
I mean look at it! Getting a trade boat in there without a lighthouse peering over the cliffs must be like trying to lay your hand on a Blightwidow covered in Riot Spikes! Blindfolded!
And if shocks are indeed reprinted...
To a town besides the sea
This card reminds me of the Adventure Time ending song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJczYn2dvm4).
Please print these dual lands at a lower rarity. I understand the Ravnica lands being printed at a higher rarity because paying life can be intimidating to newer players, but poorer players need good mana fixing. It shouldn't cost sixty dollars to build a multicolour deck that doesn't get mana screwed.
Thanks.
You and dual lands must not get along very well... try this: trade.
Of course most people won't trade lands but it doesn't hurt to try...
Awesome land tho... this, Breed Pool, Watery Grave, Woodland Cemetery, etc. have my UBG
mana base workin and lookin sweet...
I totally agree with you. Printing new types of dual lands isn't really reducing the price because people keep buying 4 of's to go in their decks that already had 4 of's of all the other dual lands. Reprints would go a long way towards reducing the cost, but its also not exactly in their interest.
This cycle was good design because it is more effective when you don't have the other dual lands. I personally think it should have specified basic land (so that it didn't work with typed dual lands), but I guess that would have been a rules-text nightmare.