Good because it doesn't sac itself but kind bad because you have to pay so much mana and discard 2 cards from your hand.
Japicx
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I would just love to put this in a huge ramp-draw deck just so I could beat people to death with an enchantment.
Shoe2
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(5 votes)
Hmmm what would happen if we Duct taped 2 Stormbinds together and then printed it?
Kryptnyt
★★★☆☆ (3.7/5.0)(3 votes)
Two cards is rough. At random breaks the deal. I can't imagine having success playing this in limited, let alone casual.
SilverstarWolf
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
So awesome and cool in theory... so disappointing on the battlefield. I've tried it in a number of casual decks, Madness and graveyard play included... and it's never done anything worthwhile.
Kirbster
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
It's extremely mana- and card (at random)-intensive. Too much to be particularly good, but... it's still kinda fun.
surevalla
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
worked well in the Japanese deck "hata burn" during invasion-odyssey era
Comments (9)
Following up on surevalla's comment:
Hata Burn
1st place among 849, Kanto Regional Championship
Invasion/Odyssey/7th Edition Standard
4 Grim Lavamancer
4 Wild Mongrel
4 Yavimaya Barbarian
4 Flametongue Kavu
3 Skizzik
4 Call of the Herd
3 Firebolt
4 Fiery Temper
4 Violent Eruption
2 Meteor Storm
4 Karplusan Forest
4 Mossfire Valley
4 Forest
2 Barbarian Ring
1 Keldon Necropolis
9 Mountain
SB:
4 Compost
3 Hull Breach
2 Engulfing Flames
2 Shivan Wurm
2 Meteor Storm
2 Tahngarth, Tarlruum Hero
(Source: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://www.wizards.com/default.asp%3Fx%3Dsideboard/jpinfo/jp20020401a)