this is the only poor creature left without any creature typesince The Grand Vreature Type Update. why didn't wizards give this card one among these 400 different choices? at least one of them should suit to this guy, shouldn't it? be it human, shapeshifter, demon or spirit... i mean it's a nameless race, not a typeless one. ;)
Guest474596941
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(4 votes)
I think them not giving it a type was a flavorful point - it is very neat to have a creature that doesn't have any types. Even if it isn't a very good card, having no creature type at least makes it an interesting card.
Guest609915294
★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0)(4 votes)
The typelessness of this card is good because it's the only interesting thing about it now, given how its power level is so atrociously misjudged!
badmofo
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(9 votes)
hahaha! his name should be nameless racist! He doens't like other white guys!
I played this card before Ice age came out and I thought it worked well. Things were different way back when, but he was a bad ass at the time.
Even now in some cases you could get a big huge trampling guy for cheap. It's not a much worse card than channel if you set it up right.
Thaxan_Number_14
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0)(2 votes)
As if Typeless Race is a more acceptable name than Nameless Race.
asmallcat
★★★☆☆ (3.6/5.0)(4 votes)
Almost always worse than minion of the wastes. Check that, just straight up always worse. With black's mana accel, there may be a one-turn difference on getting these 2 out, and the limits on this guy just make it unplayable.
Keegan__
★★★☆☆ (3.8/5.0)(2 votes)
Why did The Dark have all those weird creature types?
N84M09
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0)(2 votes)
Meh...
I tried using these in a deck once where all the sorceries were 'deal damage and gain life' and I had a friend who played a lot of white so it worked out well...
Comments (27)
why didn't wizards give this card one among these 400 different choices? at least one of them should suit to this guy, shouldn't it? be it human, shapeshifter, demon or spirit...
i mean it's a nameless race, not a typeless one. ;)
I played this card before Ice age came out and I thought it worked well. Things were different way back when, but he was a bad ass at the time.
Even now in some cases you could get a big huge trampling guy for cheap. It's not a much worse card than channel if you set it up right.
I tried using these in a deck once where all the sorceries were 'deal damage and gain life' and I had a friend who played a lot of white so it worked out well...
Oooh, WotC. You clowns.
Ohhhhhh... I see what you did there WotC
What card has "X is redundant twice"?