It's nice to see that hair on the official version. I always thought my copy was misprinted.
Tanaka348
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Hey, maybe if we put enough extra clauses on this, it'll distract people from how bad it is!
sl33tbl1nd
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Literally one of the worst cards I've ever seen.
Axelle
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
See that line in the text box? It's a hair that was caught on the card sheet.
Alsebra
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I honestly thought something was wrong with my monitor...I spent a few seconds trying to wipe off the 'hair'...
O0oze
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
LONG text. OVERCOSTED. USELESS. we're lucky wizards got better in the last... how long has it been? old fogey probably remembers.
SkyknightXi
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I notice this thing can't even be used for defense; it ONLY works for the attack. (The high CMC, by the way? Probably to account for its reusability. Same idea for creatures of the time) This must be one bloodthirsty sword...
...Was it based on Dainsleif from Norse legend, then?
Comments (13)
the effect is a nice supplement to creatures with deathtouch, but with that amount of mana required it's not worth it.
we're lucky wizards got better in the last... how long has it been? old fogey probably remembers.
...Was it based on Dainsleif from Norse legend, then?