Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Burning-Tree Bloodscale

Multiverse ID: 96898

Burning-Tree Bloodscale

Comments (11)

MasterOfEtherium
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes)
Sick Lil Thug
Laguz
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (3 votes)
Way too expensive to be playable. WAY too expensive.
Champion_Kitsune
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
Not WAY too expensive...a$$uming you can get it out with Bloodthirst, it's a Hill Giant with two good abilities :/
Tezz
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (2 votes)
best art ive ever seen on a magic card.
achilleselbow
★★☆☆☆ (2.0/5.0) (2 votes)
It IS way too expensive. Compare to Rumbling Slum from the same set and guild.
StuartHamilton
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
whenever I'm sorting through my cards, and flip past one of these, my thoughts go something like:

"Hum-de-dum, sortin' my Magi-OH MY GOD I FOUND A BURNING-TREE......Bloodscale. Dammit."
Fearsomecritter
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Fancy. I like the mirrored abilities.
Black_Sun28
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
So sad, if he had +1/+1 and his abilities each cost one less he would be really sick.
Doom_Lich
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
@ achillesbow:

Except Rumbling slum is a rare. And also doesn't cost the same amount. And has abilities that are totally different from this card. In other words comparing them just makes you look ridiculous because they're too mechanically different.
Jerec_Onyx
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Guys, this is a common. It's good for a common and the artwork is great.
Unsung31
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I wish this card was better, the art is awesome!