Kirbster 2011-01-24 ★★★★☆ (4.6/5.0) (5 votes) It's not deceptive. The dual-lands aren't a big secret you happened to stumble upon. They're good. We know.
Ideatog 2011-04-05 ★★★★☆ (4.2/5.0) (2 votes) No they're BAD! See? Bad-lands!What can you really say about the original dual lands that hasn't already been said? They eat newer lands for breakfast.
Ibn_Shisha 2013-06-09 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) Conversion still hits it. That's about the only negative I can think of.
TheWrathofShane 2013-08-25 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) This cycle ensures legacy will be exclusive to wallet warriors. Theres always RDW though.
Drewskithelegend 2014-05-29 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Pros:Taps for two colorsCounts as 2 land types Doesn't ping you for tapping itEnters the battlefield untapped without shocking youCons:Nonbasic target for land removalAffected by spells and effects that would affect either typeF***ing expensive and rare.Good/bad is subjective depending on which of these facts are important to how you will be playing.
Comments (8)
They're good. We know.
What can you really say about the original dual lands that hasn't already been said? They eat newer lands for breakfast.
Taps for two colors
Counts as 2 land types
Doesn't ping you for tapping it
Enters the battlefield untapped without shocking you
Cons:
Nonbasic target for land removal
Affected by spells and effects that would affect either type
F***ing expensive and rare.
Good/bad is subjective depending on which of these facts are important to how you will be playing.