Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Ghost-Lit Raider

Multiverse ID: 87341

Ghost-Lit Raider

Comments (7)

ZEvilMustache
★★☆☆☆ (2.1/5.0) (4 votes)
This card was great in that theme deck. Given that Channel is strictly worse than Cycling... it should cost less to use.
A3Kitsune
★★★★☆ (4.7/5.0) (3 votes)
Channel isn't strictly worse. Cycling is more restrictive, except for 'search-cycling' it's mostly limited to "draw a card". Those Cycling cards that have an additional effect when Cycled pay for it with increased Cycling costs, more than the effect would get allone if it was a Channel ability.
Cyberium
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Spirits have Channel, which can be incorporated into spiritcraft.
Enchantment_Removal
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (5 votes)
This kills Teferi at instant-speed. I would say that that tid-bit alone, due to Teferi's high status in the game, makes this card good and playable.

Furthermore, 'playing a card', especially removal, without technically casting a spell can really come in handy sometimes.
Kryptnyt
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
@A3Kitsune
I think he means to compare this to Gempalm Incinerator for a goblin deck. Though it is by no means strictly better in any way, it's pound for pound more powerful.
HotHit
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
Hmm... I've recently been on the hunt for creatures that double as makeshift instants and sorceries. Little did I expect to find the Ghost-lit cycle back in Kamigawa as well as the channel mechanic. I simply adore the design for these cards, tattered cloaks, Master Splicer-esk hats and... Well... Lanterns. Oh how I love lanterns.

Right, the card itself. Raider's the one I find most compelling. For a creature heavy deck, removal tends to be light. So, 3 mana to ping things for 2 or 4 mana to just flame slash something. It's at least worth a look.