Conservator

Colossus_of_Darkstee 2010-06-13

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

wait, why the heck did they change it from loss of life prevention to damage prevention? isnt it just better preventing loss overall than strictly damage? damage counts as life loss, right?

combobuilder 2010-09-01

★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (2 votes)

Why does the oracle text say you have to tap it? Was it an inherent part of artifact activation from back in the days when a tapped artifact didn't function? Or is it just a typo?

TDL 2011-04-19

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

The type "Mono Artifact" meant you had to tap the artifact, in addition to any other mentioned costs, to get the effect.

NoobOfLore 2011-08-19

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

All the life loss I've seen explicitly states that it cannot be prevented or redirected, so letting this prevent life loss would be a moot point, since no life loss can be prevented in the first place.

Ibn_Shisha 2013-06-10

★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)

It's not that bad: Animate Artifact it, block opponent's Craw Wurm, then sac it to Orcish Mechanics (since the current Oracle wording of that card allows you to).

MCcreator 2013-10-28

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

It's the 'Mono' that kills it...

Comments (6)