Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Wild Wurm

Multiverse ID: 4856

Wild Wurm

Comments (13)

Ace8792
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.6/5.0) (8 votes)
bad bad bad bad. No wait worst card ever.
Bouchart
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
I can see this being interesting in a Pandemonium based deck.
nammertime
★★★☆☆ (3.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Useful with Chance Encounter also, though a BIT expensive.
John-Bender
★★★★☆ (4.0/5.0) (1 vote)
I'm pretty sure there has been a card with a more negative ability then this, Ace.
AXER
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.9/5.0) (4 votes)
Wrong Art! This looks like a Dragon.
HedgeIII
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Compared to the standard Hill Giant, it's not bad. Overall, I give it the middling 2.5 stars.
achilleselbow
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (2 votes)
No it doesn't. Dragons have wings and legs. This is definitely a wurm.
Yea, definitely synergizes with Pandemonium (and in the same block too!), as well as any Unearth effects.
xNavarone
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (4 votes)
Flavour text is slaughtering me lolololol.

Wurm HEADS
...
Wurm TAILS
...

lmao.
DrJack
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Really, you guys think this is that bad? 5/4 for 3R, that might take a couple attempts to summon? Maybe not a punishing powerhouse like Rathi Dragon or the old Juzam Djinn, but still. I think you're all "misunderestimating" this card. Heh.
Layk
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes)
@achilleselbow

Except it does look like a dragon ****tard, and if you can't see that you're blind. Just because it doesn't have wings or legs doesn't mean it doesn't look like a dragon, and considering wurms descended from dragons that became wurms I would say it looks like one. So I agree with AXER, the art looks like a dragon, and taking into account that today wurms no longer look like dragons in their art, this art might seem odd to people.
Kirbster
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
"Wurm heads appear"? This thing has multiple heads?
jonrds
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote)
YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH BADGES TO TRAIN ME
car2n
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This guy once substituted Miracle Whip with mayonnaise, because he's WILD!