izzet_guild_mage 2010-05-13 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (5 votes) I find it ironic that the artifact lands weren't legendary...there's only one Tel-Jilad.
Lateralis0ne 2010-07-14 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Well, if these WERE Legendary....then affinity wouldn't have been as bogus as it was.
Folesauce 2010-10-18 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) This land DOES make sense, because the entire plane was made out of metal. Hence the tree of tales was made out of metal. And is an artifact.
Revelation666 2010-10-19 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) If you aren't playing standard, these will make your Ezuri's Brigades 8/8 trampling beaters for 4 with no drawback
WateryMind 2011-07-06 ★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (1 vote) "Hey guys, what about artifacts, that are LANDS! Nobody could possibly break that!"-.-
DoragonShinzui 2012-08-28 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Guys, the artifact lands weren't broken.AFFINITY was the broken bit. Eaugh, that was a frightening time.
BegleOne 2013-05-14 ☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0) Making them Legendary would've made flavor sense and could've balanced them. It'd be risky to run 4 of a land that you can only have one at a time of.Why didn't they?My money is that they really wanted artifact lands at common, and couldn't stand the idea of a common Legend.
Comments (11)
-.-
AFFINITY was the broken bit. Eaugh, that was a frightening time.
Why didn't they?
My money is that they really wanted artifact lands at common, and couldn't stand the idea of a common Legend.