ah, the last terror. Sadly in a block that could find little use for it.
Saxophonist
★★★☆☆ (3.9/5.0)(4 votes)
OH MY GOD, IT'S BRIAN PEPPERS!!
TheSwarm
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0)(3 votes)
Really? In mirrodin, this card reads "Destroy target nonarti.. oh. damn." Hey wizards, shards is coming wanna reprint this in thaaat too?
allmighty_abacus
★★★★☆ (4.9/5.0)(9 votes)
"Say, let's reprint terror in the next block!" "Sounds grand! That's a classic card, right? I'm sure it'll find plenty of fresh targets! I mean, it's not like the next block takes place on a plane made entirely of metal, right?" "Oh wait, actually it-" "Nonsense! Say no more. I'm sure the players will love to see terror again."
Oh WotC, you so crazy
divine_exodus
★★★★☆ (4.4/5.0)(8 votes)
Do you guys realize the artist's name is "puddnhead"??
MasterOfEtherium
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(4 votes)
That Art Is Beast Wish They Brought Back PuddnHead. Plus Terror Is So Awesome
GrimjawxRULES
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
I'm actually pretty glad they ended up reprinting it in Mirrodin. Sure, it might not have been very useful in limited or tournament play, but it really left its mark on my local casual metagame, which I actually think was pretty cool.
DellamorteDellamore0
★★★★☆ (4.8/5.0)(8 votes)
I would love to see Terror printed in a dual deck with some new amazing art, a la counterspell. Btw, this art sucks.
Mike-C
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(4 votes)
Agreed. This art is really bad. Looks like one of those poor unfortunate souls held captive by Ursula on the little mermaid.. That or the little critters found between toes on 1 of those athletes foot commercials! Haha either way, it's a complete disgrace from the original & was a waste of some perfectly good cardboard. Terror wrecked shop back in the day tho!
Iktomi
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Actually, Wizards kenw exactly what they were doing bringing terror back for Mirrodin. Rosewater wanted to make a set where people would draft shatter over terror, and for that to happen they kinda needed to print both shatter and terror.
@TheSwarm:
Actually, he said in his column that they did consider reprinting it in Scars for that very reason, but couldn't find a place for it.
Piconoe
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0)(1 vote)
@DellamorteDellamore0 Do not insult the great Puddnhead's work, or he'll banish you with the Door of Nothingness.
PopcornBunni
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I think an artifact-centric setting is exactly the place for this. If the standard has nothing but weak artifact creature choices, no one would want to be using them, as their only out is that they don't die to one card from one colour. When strong artifact creatures are a theme alongside strong normal creatures, this will hit its mark against some, but not all things. Non-restricted removal shouldn't be at common.
Comments (12)
"Sounds grand! That's a classic card, right? I'm sure it'll find plenty of fresh targets! I mean, it's not like the next block takes place on a plane made entirely of metal, right?"
"Oh wait, actually it-"
"Nonsense! Say no more. I'm sure the players will love to see terror again."
Oh WotC, you so crazy
@TheSwarm:
Actually, he said in his column that they did consider reprinting it in Scars for that very reason, but couldn't find a place for it.
Do not insult the great Puddnhead's work, or he'll banish you with the Door of Nothingness.