Pointed Discussion

Magic: The Gathering Card Comments Archive

Lava Hounds

Multiverse ID: 45383

Lava Hounds

Comments (10)

LCD_88
★★★★☆ (4.3/5.0) (3 votes)
These guys should be Elementals in addition to their Hound type, I think.
KrosanGardener
★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (2 votes)
ROAR!
Ace8792
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (3 votes)
This card sucks it should at least be changed to a creature type that is actully used like Element, or something.
Kryptnyt
★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (4 votes)
I think they're fair. I'd definetly play em in a hound tribal deck.
Mister_Tapwater
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (6 votes)
I like this card, a hasty 4/4 for 4 is nothing to sneeze at. Good finisher for a mono-red beatdown deck, or maybe just a solid guy in red-green midrange. Not sure why it got bumped to up rare in 8th, seems fine as an uncommon, albeit a powerful one.
leomistico
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0) (2 votes)
I think it's fine as it is... It's meant to be at the top of the curve of an aggressive red deck, with lots of hasty creatures... I used to play such a deck, and with some equipment like Grafted Wargear and Ronin Warclub performed quite well, until 5th turn from which it used to lost some fuel...

Not a super-card, but honestly good! It works, if you put it in the right deck...
4/5
Anubisisking
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I have to say, I'm actually rather partial to this card, even if it's not great.
Jannissary
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)
Pretty bad.

4/4 hate for 4 that gives you a Lightning Bolt plus a little extra straight to your face.

I'll pass.
TheWrathofShane
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
This card is actually pretty solid. Who cares if your health is 16 if your smashing them with a 4/4 haste.
Earthdawn
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
Personal Sanctuary or Nearheath Pilgrim would work nicely with this guy.