Skittish Valesk

True_Mumin 2009-08-14

★★★☆☆ (3.2/5.0) (8 votes)

Uhh... Wait, what?

O__o

0,5/5.

Snaxme 2009-11-30

★★★☆☆ (3.1/5.0) (7 votes)

...exactly my reaction.

0/5

mdakw576 2009-12-13

★★★☆☆ (3.4/5.0) (7 votes)

i think it's funny how it's uncommon too

Duskdale_Wurm 2010-06-26

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

Bought an Onslaught booster and found this card.

O_0

metalevolence 2010-08-19

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

The art is pretty intense. If this was a strong card, I would probably like it a lot.

HuntingDrake 2010-08-29

★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0) (4 votes)

I've won games in two separate drafts with this guy. NO morph creature should be rated less than 1.0/5.0.

PolskiSuzeren 2010-11-14

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

When I first saw this, I thought it said Sh*tting valesk.

Much more entertaining.

SolidSoldier 2011-01-23

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

Worst. Beast. Ever.

Ava_Adore 2011-02-10

★★☆☆☆ (2.8/5.0) (2 votes)

only application at all is with the cards that trigger when a creature you control is turned face up, but that morph cost is just way too expensive to trigger a ping effect etc

ICEFANG13 2011-03-30

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (2 votes)

Created in the same train of thought as Razor Boomerang

0.5/5

SirMalkin 2011-05-14

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Should have been a rare, just for the lulz.

sonorhC 2011-07-07

★★★★☆ (4.5/5.0) (9 votes)

Most of you are reading this card wrong. It's not a 5/5 for

with a drawback; it's a 2/2 for

with an overpriced pump ability. Just the fact that it has Morph makes it strictly better than Pearled Unicorn or Raging Bull, both of which are rated higher than this. It's bad, but it's not that bad.

Radagast 2011-07-20

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

So... I can either spend 6R for a 5/5 with a horrible drawback, or 3 and then 5R for the same trash... Yeah, no thanks!

Baconradar 2011-10-22

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Morph cards shouldn't be rated this low. They are, at worst, 2/2 for 3 colourless.

I actually have a copy of this in an erratic explosion deck I'm trying to build. He is one of the weakest cards there, but I haven't found a suitabe replacement yet. I've obviously never played him for his CC or his flip cost, only for the baseline 3.

Dolorosa 2012-01-12

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

Aw, it's shy. It must be self-conscious about how *** awful it is and doing us a favor by hiding away out of sight. At least you're not Chimney Imp, Valesk.

YawgmothsWish 2012-02-12

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

Much better than Raging Bull.

EpicBroccoli 2012-02-26

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.5/5.0) (1 vote)

So it's a 5/5 for

with... a drawback?

Wait what?

foazak 2014-01-18

☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)

The reason this guy is rated worse than 2/2 for 3 creatures is because all of that text and his 5/5 body gives you hope that he might be good, but then you realize the text is just a drawback on a creature that was already overpriced for its power.

Comments (18)