Or even better, put it on a Piledriver to get some overtime pay. And hey look, trample.
Tezz
★★★☆☆ (3.0/5.0)(1 vote)
should be 'non-defender'?
Alsebra
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
@Tezz - Not really...not all creatures that have defender are walls (Perimeter Captain, Gomazoa, and many others).
Mode
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
@Tezz: I guess not, since the Oracle tries to stay as true to the original wording as possible. Well, if they want to make an (almost) functional reprint of this, they should exchange the "non-Wall creatures" for "creatures without Defender" for sure.
While we're having 'only' this, we should just evade putting any non-Wall Defenders along with this Aura in the same deck.
Equinox523
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
Fun with "all in" creature decks like Battalion. Trample is extremely relevant, and for a single this is worth consideration.
NobuTheBard
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
I wonder why they felt the need to specify that only your attacking non-walls count. Did testing show that people were attacking with their walls when this was out, thinking it enabled that? Was it because they knew, someday, that a set would come out in which Walls would finally have their day, and the only thing between us and a ruinous bad future was to put that there?
Comments (6)
Or even better, put it on a Piledriver to get some overtime pay. And hey look, trample.
Well, if they want to make an (almost) functional reprint of this, they should exchange the "non-Wall creatures" for "creatures without Defender" for sure.
While we're having 'only' this, we should just evade putting any non-Wall Defenders along with this Aura in the same deck.