I always called this card Engulfing Elephants. In fact, it should be called that.
It's not terrible though. Not great either.
Kryptnyt
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(5 votes)
I love casting this over and over in MTG: Battlegrounds. Also, there was really no reason to not print this in Innistrad instead of Geistflame. They must have totally forgot about it and redesigned it.
@Baconradar: It's not strictly better. Geistflame can hit players.
Goatllama
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(2 votes)
Ironic because most elephants are 3/3s that don't regenerate anyways.
Lord_of_phyrexia
☆☆☆☆☆ (0.0/5.0)
@kryptnyt: the card gets exiled when you use the flashback, so how do you use it more than twice?
Lord_of_Gelectrodes
★★★★★ (5.0/5.0)(1 vote)
@Kryptnyt Geistflame is much more flavorful; and I though Innistrad was a pretty appealing set as a vorthos. Also, Innistrad was at about the time when they decided Regeneration wasn't really strong or abundant enough to be hosed as much as is it is.
Comments (9)
HAHA!
It's not terrible though. Not great either.
Also, there was really no reason to not print this in Innistrad instead of Geistflame. They must have totally forgot about it and redesigned it.
Geistflame is much more flavorful; and I though Innistrad was a pretty appealing set as a vorthos.
Also, Innistrad was at about the time when they decided Regeneration wasn't really strong or abundant enough to be hosed as much as is it is.